This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
I thought this version was an improvement. The alignment isn't worth the extra whitespace and strange wrapping (I will upload a screenshot). It also breaks the lists per WP:LISTGAP. Thanks! Plastikspork―Œ(talk)04:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-17T04:52:00.000Z","author":"Plastikspork","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Plastikspork-2013-06-17T04:52:00.000Z-Format","replies":["c-Frietjes-2015-04-18T16:11:00.000Z-Plastikspork-2013-06-17T04:52:00.000Z"]}}-->
yes, I agree. also, we shouldn't be merging list items per MOS:ACCESS. Frietjes (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-18T16:11:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Frietjes-2015-04-18T16:11:00.000Z-Plastikspork-2013-06-17T04:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Charlesaaronthompson-2015-11-24T22:36:00.000Z-Frietjes-2015-04-18T16:11:00.000Z"]}}-->
Shouldn't the format in the template break down the years by single decades, instead of double decades, like it is now? Most other sports championship templates list the years of the event by a single decade, such as the World Series template, for example. That was the purpose of my revision to the template, seen here. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T22:36:00.000Z","author":"Charlesaaronthompson","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Charlesaaronthompson-2015-11-24T22:36:00.000Z-Frietjes-2015-04-18T16:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
