This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rugby union This template is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union Scotland This template is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland

I have changed the formatting of this template so that it is similar to the other rugby links templates; {{French_Rugby_links}}, {{Eng rugby prem}}, {{Pacific rugby union links}}, {{Irish rugby links}}, {{Italian_Rugby_links}}, {{SANZAR links}}, {{Rugby Wales links}}.

Is there any reason for Scotland to be different ? KeithW 23:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-03T23:04:00.000Z","author":"KeithW","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KeithW-2006-08-03T23:04:00.000Z-Formatting","replies":[]}}-->

I've reverted this template to what is, in my opinion, a far more useful and effective set-up. However another more established user is clearly of a different view and I'm fully expecting that it won't last long. I find the notion that we have to settle for a worse-looking template, just to standardise with other countries boxes, unfair unjustified and insulting, because the original one which I had updated and tidied was very effective and took people straight to what they wanted. Lets not kid ourselves that many people accessing the page will know much or anything about Scottish domestic rugby or its organisation.

However, this is probably going to get ridden roughshod over in the quest for standardization, but I'll live in hope it won't. HibeeJibee —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 00:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-20T00:00:00.000Z","author":"HibeeJibee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HibeeJibee-2007-09-20T00:00:00.000Z-Formatting","replies":[]}}-->

Have tried to reach a compromise by introducing new elements, and removing the Premiership club lists from the bottom. HibeeJibee 00:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-20T00:23:00.000Z","author":"HibeeJibee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HibeeJibee-2007-09-20T00:23:00.000Z-Formatting","replies":[]}}-->

This template shouldn't be appearing in club articles. - Dudesleeper / Talk 22:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-03-07T22:55:00.000Z","author":"Dudesleeper","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dudesleeper-2009-03-07T22:55:00.000Z-Club_articles","replies":[]}}-->

Not a national team of Scotland. An English-dominated tour side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.88.118.249 (talk) 09:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-10-01T09:21:00.000Z","author":"31.88.118.249","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-31.88.118.249-2018-10-01T09:21:00.000Z-Lions","replies":[]}}-->