Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Template talk:Pomeranian history

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Break-up-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z-Break-up"],"text":"Break-up","linkableTitle":"Break-up"}-->

Break-up

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Break-up-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z-Break-up"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Break-up-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z-Break-up"],"text":"Break-up","linkableTitle":"Break-up"}-->

I broke out a section under Major Demographic events per edit summary suggestion. Two reasons. First, it's not a good idea to mix up two different things - peoples and events - in a single section as that just leads to confusion and looks sloppy. Second, the way that the text was arranged previously seemed like it was trying to suggest a certain POV (i.e. Poles only in Pomerania after 1945). The demographic events section should probably be expended with other demographic phenomenon.radek (talk) 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z","author":"Radeksz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Radeksz-2009-11-28T23:31:00.000Z-Break-up","replies":[],"displayName":"radek"}}-->

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya

Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.188.22.213