Template talk:Places in Singapore

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Untitled_section_2004-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004","c-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004"],"text":"Untitled section 2004","linkableTitle":"Untitled section 2004"}-->

Untitled section 2004

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Untitled_section_2004-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004","c-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-SpLoT-2007-01-16T13:08:00.000Z-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z","timestamp":"2007-01-16T13:08:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__3__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__3__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Untitled_section_2004-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004","c-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004"],"text":"Untitled section 2004","linkableTitle":"Untitled section 2004"}-->

I don't think "suburbs" is suitable, because the list includes places like Orchard Road, Tanjong Pagar, Raffles Place, and so forth that are clearly in downtown Singapore. -- ran (talk) 17:59, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)

Suburb exists, whether there are downtowns or not, hence suburb must be included for certain areas, while the rest could retain their original titles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slivester (talk • contribs) 23:59, 17 October 2004 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z","author":"Slivester","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Slivester-2004-10-17T23:59:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004","replies":[]}}-->

Should we include mention of things like the Central Area and urban planning divisions by the URA, or is that not needed? I'm thinking it would provide a sense of orientation as well as an outlook on the country as a whole, ie. division of functions among towns. -- Natalinasmpf 03:58, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The current effort to group them by regions looks horrid to say the least. Is it neccesary to embark on this in the first place?--Huaiwei 12:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z","author":"Huaiwei","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z-Untitled_section_2004","replies":["c-SpLoT-2007-01-16T13:08:00.000Z-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z"]}}-->
I think it gives the template some sort of organization, rather than just piling everything together alphabetically. - SpLoT (*C*+u+g) 13:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-01-16T13:08:00.000Z","author":"SpLoT","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-SpLoT-2007-01-16T13:08:00.000Z-Huaiwei-2007-01-16T12:37:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"SpL"}}-->