This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Electronics This template is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic Technology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Under former and defunct JVs and shareholdings, shouldn't we list the following companies?

• PolyGram (initially a JV, jointly owned with Siemens, later a 100% daughter)
• Navteq
• TSMC
• Grundig
• B&O
• Marantz

The Seventh Taylor (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-10-02T00:39:00.000Z","author":"The Seventh Taylor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Seventh_Taylor-2012-10-02T00:39:00.000Z-More_stakes","replies":["c-Rangoon11-2012-10-02T00:44:00.000Z-The_Seventh_Taylor-2012-10-02T00:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sure, why not.Rangoon11 (talk) 00:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-10-02T00:44:00.000Z","author":"Rangoon11","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Rangoon11-2012-10-02T00:44:00.000Z-The_Seventh_Taylor-2012-10-02T00:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-The_Seventh_Taylor-2012-12-30T01:26:00.000Z-Rangoon11-2012-10-02T00:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Done. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-12-30T01:26:00.000Z","author":"The Seventh Taylor","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-The_Seventh_Taylor-2012-12-30T01:26:00.000Z-Rangoon11-2012-10-02T00:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

user:R'n'B wrote: there is nothing in either the Philips or Bang & Olufsen articles documenting any joint venture or ownership relation between the two companies.

You may be right here. I also cannot find evidence of it elsewhere, other than a "strategic alliance" which apparently involved a temporary flow of money from Philips to B&O. [1] The Seventh Taylor (talk) 04:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-03T04:43:00.000Z","author":"The Seventh Taylor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Seventh_Taylor-2013-01-03T04:43:00.000Z-B&O","replies":[]}}-->

I have fixed the overstyling per WP:DEVIATIONS and to match the format used by Template:Siemens and all the others. Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-09-14T21:02:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Frietjes-2017-09-14T21:02:00.000Z-Overstyling","replies":[]}}-->