Template talk:Northumbrian monarchs

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Rulers_of_Bamburgh-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z-Rulers_of_Bamburgh"],"text":"Rulers of Bamburgh","linkableTitle":"Rulers of Bamburgh"}-->

Rulers of Bamburgh

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Rulers_of_Bamburgh-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z-Rulers_of_Bamburgh"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Rulers_of_Bamburgh-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z-Rulers_of_Bamburgh"],"text":"Rulers of Bamburgh","linkableTitle":"Rulers of Bamburgh"}-->

The following, who seem to have ruled only the northern part of Northumbria, appear in the template. I suggest that they should be deleted, so that the template shows only those whose control covered the southern part of Northumbria:- 1. Ecgberht II of Northumbria 2. Eadwulf II of Northumbria 3. Ealdred of Northumbria. Alekksandr (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","author":"Alekksandr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z-Rulers_of_Bamburgh","replies":["c-Alekksandr-2015-04-09T18:57:00.000Z-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Now done. Alekksandr (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-09T18:57:00.000Z","author":"Alekksandr","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Alekksandr-2015-04-09T18:57:00.000Z-Alekksandr-2015-04-07T17:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Split_navbox-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z-Split_navbox"],"text":"Split navbox","linkableTitle":"Split navbox"}-->

Split navbox

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Split_navbox-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z-Split_navbox"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Split_navbox-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z-Split_navbox"],"text":"Split navbox","linkableTitle":"Split navbox"}-->

I think it might be a good idea to split the navbox into at least a couple of groups so that kings of Northumbria pre-867 and post-867 are in different sections. A third category might be those kings that did not use the title "King of Northumbria", but were kings of both Deira and Bernicia and so ruled the same territory as those later kings. I'll give some time for comments/criticisms before making any changes. Retroplum (talk) 23:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","author":"Retroplum","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z-Split_navbox","replies":["c-Retroplum-2015-05-20T13:57:00.000Z-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

No one has offered an objection so I've went ahead and made the change. Retroplum (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-20T13:57:00.000Z","author":"Retroplum","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Retroplum-2015-05-20T13:57:00.000Z-Retroplum-2015-05-04T23:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->