Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Template talk:NZ National Party

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Leader-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z-Leader"],"text":"Leader","linkableTitle":"Leader"}-->

Leader

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Leader-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z-Leader"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Leader-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z-Leader"],"text":"Leader","linkableTitle":"Leader"}-->

Removing Forbes as per discussion on main NZ National Party page DPF (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","author":"Dpf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z-Leader","replies":["c-Mattlore-2011-02-28T22:47:00.000Z-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

While I agree that Forbes was never leader, do you think he should be listed there under Forbes (1936 - acting) or something like that. It seems a little odd to leave him out altogether. Mattlore (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-28T22:47:00.000Z","author":"Mattlore","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mattlore-2011-02-28T22:47:00.000Z-Dpf-2011-02-28T22:19:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017"],"text":"New Zealand National Party leadership election, 2017","linkableTitle":"New Zealand National Party leadership election, 2017"}-->

New Zealand National Party leadership election, 2017

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017"],"text":"New Zealand National Party leadership election, 2017","linkableTitle":"New Zealand National Party leadership election, 2017"}-->

Pokelova: The redlink that you've added for the 2017 New Zealand National Party leadership election – is that the caucus vote that happened earlier today? If so, that's a totally normal procedure that happens after every general election. This is only notable if the incumbent gets challenged. As it was a total non-event what happened today, such an article will never meet GNG. As such, I shall revert your addition again. Let that not stop you to put up a good argument here why that election was notable. If you reinstate your addition, I won't revert you a third time, but shall let others weigh in. Schwede66 09:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z","author":"Schwede66","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Schwede66-2017-10-24T09:19:00.000Z-New_Zealand_National_Party_leadership_election,_2017","replies":[],"displayName":"Schwede"}}-->

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya

Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.117.141.164