Template talk:Lighthouses of Wisconsin

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Lost_lights\"-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z-\"Lost_lights\""],"text":"\"Lost lights\"","linkableTitle":"\"Lost lights\""}-->

"Lost lights"

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Lost_lights\"-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z-\"Lost_lights\""]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Lost_lights\"-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z-\"Lost_lights\""],"text":"\"Lost lights\"","linkableTitle":"\"Lost lights\""}-->

I don't feel that this section of the template sets the right tone for an encyclopedia. I understand that this is from a book, but the title sounds like it has been coined as a narrative hook. The second issue is that most of the entries are already included under "Lake Michigan". I would like to understand how this section improves the template rather than just being borderline promotional. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z","author":"Knowledgekid87","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Knowledgekid87-2019-03-15T13:55:00.000Z-\"Lost_lights\"","replies":[]}}-->