This template is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Due to [edit] the template's link to the Intersexual Flag is now dead. I'd fix it, but I can't find a replacement. Should it be removed from the template? —Quasirandom (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-11T18:53:00.000Z","author":"Quasirandom","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Quasirandom-2011-10-11T18:53:00.000Z-Intersexual_flag","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-L3X1-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-72.204.88.177_has_been_hard_at_work-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-L3X1-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z-72.204.88.177_has_been_hard_at_work"],"text":"72.204.88.177 has been hard at work","linkableTitle":"72.204.88.177 has been hard at work"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-L3X1-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-72.204.88.177_has_been_hard_at_work-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-L3X1-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z-72.204.88.177_has_been_hard_at_work"],"text":"72.204.88.177 has been hard at work","linkableTitle":"72.204.88.177 has been hard at work"}-->
is he correct, or a misinformed vandal?? Can someone also double-check all his contribs because he is very active in the genre of LGBT. L3X1 (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z","author":"L3X1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-L3X1-2017-01-03T22:00:00.000Z-72.204.88.177_has_been_hard_at_work","replies":[]}}-->
Note: GS22 removed asexuality from the template. I don't feel strongly about the matter either way, but there are WP:Reliable sources that include asexual people as part of the LGBT community. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-28T21:49:00.000Z","author":"Flyer22 Reborn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Flyer22_Reborn-2017-08-28T21:49:00.000Z-Asexuality","replies":["c-Grapesoda22-2017-08-29T00:35:00.000Z-Flyer22_Reborn-2017-08-28T21:49:00.000Z"]}}-->
The Asexuality page is not categorized as an LGBT page, nor are there any LGBT navboxes or portals linked to it. Grapesoda22 (✉) 00:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-29T00:35:00.000Z","author":"Grapesoda22","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Grapesoda22-2017-08-29T00:35:00.000Z-Flyer22_Reborn-2017-08-28T21:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-EvergreenFir-2017-08-29T01:49:00.000Z-Grapesoda22-2017-08-29T00:35:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Grapesoda22: Likely because of POV pushers... they should be. EvergreenFir(talk)01:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-29T01:49:00.000Z","author":"EvergreenFir","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-EvergreenFir-2017-08-29T01:49:00.000Z-Grapesoda22-2017-08-29T00:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Flyer22_Reborn-2017-08-29T19:44:00.000Z-EvergreenFir-2017-08-29T01:49:00.000Z"]}}-->
LOL, EvergreenFir. Yes, we can see that Grapesoda22 removed the category. Asexuality is certainly mention on the LGBT page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-29T19:44:00.000Z","author":"Flyer22 Reborn","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Flyer22_Reborn-2017-08-29T19:44:00.000Z-EvergreenFir-2017-08-29T01:49:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->