This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This template is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-All_of_GE_media-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z-All_of_GE_media"],"text":"All of GE media","linkableTitle":"All of GE media"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-All_of_GE_media-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z-All_of_GE_media"],"text":"All of GE media","linkableTitle":"All of GE media"}-->
Do we really need individual links to all of GE's media assets in the template? As a proportion of revenue, it's a tiny segment, but the editors of this template would have us think that is primarily what GE does. Their primary business is really financial services, but I don't think the template should be dominated by that, either. The list of media assets is a big ugly mess with footnotes and such. Perhaps it should be restricted to the major operating divisions. —Joseph/N328KF(Talk)03:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z","author":"N328KF","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z-All_of_GE_media","replies":["c-N328KF-2006-07-01T12:41:00.000Z-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Joseph\/N328KF"}}-->
Since nobody has seen fit to even respond, I will either start removing these items or split them into a separate template named Template:General Electric media assets. —Joseph/N328KF(Talk)12:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-07-01T12:41:00.000Z","author":"N328KF","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-N328KF-2006-07-01T12:41:00.000Z-N328KF-2006-06-06T03:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Lostintherush-2006-07-01T12:50:00.000Z-N328KF-2006-07-01T12:41:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Joseph\/N328KF"}}-->
I second you. All 6 business units must be shown in proportion. GE is not just a media company -- Lost12:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-07-01T12:50:00.000Z","author":"Lostintherush","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Lostintherush-2006-07-01T12:50:00.000Z-N328KF-2006-07-01T12:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-CoolKatt_number_99999-2006-07-03T18:48:00.000Z-Lostintherush-2006-07-01T12:50:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Lost"}}-->
I moved the template to a better name, Template:NBC Universal. CoolKatt number 9999918:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-07-03T18:48:00.000Z","author":"CoolKatt number 99999","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-CoolKatt_number_99999-2006-07-03T18:48:00.000Z-Lostintherush-2006-07-01T12:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I totally rewrote the template to match the format of {{Dell Inc}}. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 03:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-22T03:48:00.000Z","author":"Disavian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Disavian-2007-04-22T03:48:00.000Z-Rewrite","replies":[]}}-->
I am hoping we can reformat this a bit to reduce the width of the template. on a 1024x768 screen you get one column of links due to the excessive group widths and image width. one option would be to try using an image that has a taller aspect ratio. another option would be to move the headings over the lists, ala {{navbox with collapsible groups}}, but without having them collapsed. any suggestions? Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-27T14:29:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Frietjes-2013-04-27T14:29:00.000Z-Width","replies":["c-Rangoon11-2013-04-27T16:23:00.000Z-Frietjes-2013-04-27T14:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
I'm opposed to the use of collapsible groups as I don't think the template is large enough to justify it. I'm happy to try images with a taller aspect ratio.Rangoon11 (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-27T16:23:00.000Z","author":"Rangoon11","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Rangoon11-2013-04-27T16:23:00.000Z-Frietjes-2013-04-27T14:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-Frietjes-2013-04-27T17:22:00.000Z-Rangoon11-2013-04-27T16:23:00.000Z"]}}-->
yes, I don't think they should be collapsed either, which is why I said "but without having them collapsed". a taller image would be the best option. Frietjes (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-27T17:22:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Frietjes-2013-04-27T17:22:00.000Z-Rangoon11-2013-04-27T16:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->