This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Template talk:Gazetted beaches in Hong Kong is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Hong Kong This template is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles Hong Kong To-do: edit history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (1,054) Image needed (348) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,479) • Stub-Class articles (6,682) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (387) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339) British Overseas Territories This template is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles

I propose we remove the word "Beach" from the titles of beaches in this box, as the name of the box makes clear this is about beaches. All these redundant, repetitive words are no more than visual clutter.

—A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 04:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-19T04:59:00.000Z","author":"Altercari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Altercari-2017-05-19T04:59:00.000Z-Proposal_to_remove_the_word_Beach_from_beach_names","replies":["c-Citobun-2017-06-01T17:31:00.000Z-Altercari-2017-05-19T04:59:00.000Z"],"displayName":"A L T E R C A R I"}}-->

I don't feel strongly either way, but – there must be a precedent out there we can refer to? This discussion is also relevant to Template:Public libraries in Hong Kong. Citobun (talk) 17:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-01T17:31:00.000Z","author":"Citobun","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Citobun-2017-06-01T17:31:00.000Z-Altercari-2017-05-19T04:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Altercari-2017-06-02T13:36:00.000Z-Citobun-2017-06-01T17:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Template:Protected areas of California may be a relevant example of leaving out redundant words like Forest, Park, Sanctuary in this example.
• Template:Beaches of New South Wales is a little inconsistent but seems to omit mostly.
• Template:Beaches in Puerto Rico is also inconsistent but retains Beach and Playita at least once each.

Thank you for linking Public libraries in Hong Kong. I'll crosspost this to WT:HK for more responses. —A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 13:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-02T13:36:00.000Z","author":"Altercari","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Altercari-2017-06-02T13:36:00.000Z-Citobun-2017-06-01T17:31:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"A L T E R C A R I"}}-->