I would like to see the "Court of Appeal" section moved to above the Federal Court section to better reflect the hierarchy of the court system. --Bepa (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-29T13:39:00.000Z","author":"Bepa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bepa-2010-01-29T13:39:00.000Z-Proposed_changes_part_2","replies":[]}}-->
I have three proposed changes to this template:
Singularity42 (talk) 06:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-18T06:22:00.000Z","author":"Singularity42","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Singularity42-2009-08-18T06:22:00.000Z-Proposed_changes","replies":["c-Sherurcij-2009-08-18T06:34:00.000Z-Singularity42-2009-08-18T06:22:00.000Z"]}}-->
I just wanted to put a note here that this template may be strongly affected by the result the following proposed policy: WP: Notability (law) - specifically the proposed policy regarding judges, as the Tax Court of Canada does not set binding precedent. Singularity42 (talk) 19:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-22T19:04:00.000Z","author":"Singularity42","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Singularity42-2009-08-22T19:04:00.000Z-Tax_Court_Judges_-_Noteability","replies":["c-Sherurcij-2009-08-23T04:05:00.000Z-Singularity42-2009-08-22T19:04:00.000Z"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.12.163.76