Template talk:Defunct political parties in the Netherlands

Some 'rules':

  • parties must have been in the Dutch parliament to be taken up in the list;
  • party is are grouped per pillar;
  • party is are ordered by year of foundation;
  • parties that have been in government are bolded.
    -C mon 17:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-21T17:03:00.000Z","author":"C mon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-C_mon-2006-08-21T17:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Which_parties_included-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z-Which_parties_included"],"text":"Which parties included","linkableTitle":"Which parties included"}-->

Which parties included

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Which_parties_included-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z-Which_parties_included"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:52:00.000Z-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:42:00.000Z","timestamp":"2011-01-23T13:52:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__4__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__3__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Which_parties_included-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z-Which_parties_included"],"text":"Which parties included","linkableTitle":"Which parties included"}-->

The statement above is that parties must have been in parliament to be included, but at least 2 of the parties currently on the list (haven't checked them all): New Right, National Alliance.

Do we want to change the rules, or remove the non-represented parties? Whaledad (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","author":"Whaledad","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z-Which_parties_included","replies":["c-C_mon-2011-01-22T00:06:00.000Z-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've opted for the second. The parties listed were not very relevant in Dutch politics, two out of five weren't even represented in parliament. C mon (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-22T00:06:00.000Z","author":"C mon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-C_mon-2011-01-22T00:06:00.000Z-Whaledad-2011-01-21T18:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:42:00.000Z-C_mon-2011-01-22T00:06:00.000Z"]}}-->
The Alliance for the Democratization of the Army, Peasants' League and Middle Party for City and Country were also not in parliament. SpeakFree (talk) 13:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-23T13:42:00.000Z","author":"SpeakFree","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:42:00.000Z-C_mon-2011-01-22T00:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:52:00.000Z-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:42:00.000Z"]}}-->
My mistake, didn't see a Representation section. SpeakFree (talk) 13:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-23T13:52:00.000Z","author":"SpeakFree","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:52:00.000Z-SpeakFree-2011-01-23T13:42:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NFSreloaded-20240707161800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-July_2024-20240707161800","replies":["c-NFSreloaded-20240707161800-July_2024"],"text":"July 2024","linkableTitle":"July 2024"}-->

July 2024

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NFSreloaded-20240707161800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-July_2024-20240707161800","replies":["c-NFSreloaded-20240707161800-July_2024"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Dajasj-20240707164000-NFSreloaded-20240707163800","timestamp":"20240707164000"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__4__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NFSreloaded-20240707161800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-July_2024-20240707161800","replies":["c-NFSreloaded-20240707161800-July_2024"],"text":"July 2024","linkableTitle":"July 2024"}-->

@Dajasj: care to share your reasoning behind this revision? --NFSreloaded (talk) 16:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240707161800","author":"NFSreloaded","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-NFSreloaded-20240707161800-July_2024","replies":["c-Dajasj-20240707162900-NFSreloaded-20240707161800"]}}-->

I think the mix of bold and non-bold is restless/chaotic, while it is a bit arbitrary to highlight parties that at some point have been in government. Also slightly confusing when you see this template on a page, because the page is automatically in bold (and the party I was looking at has not been in government). Dajasj (talk) 16:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240707162900","author":"Dajasj","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dajasj-20240707162900-NFSreloaded-20240707161800","replies":["c-NFSreloaded-20240707163800-Dajasj-20240707162900"]}}-->
Fair enough. You also removed the Only parties represented in parliament are shown. line, however. For the sake of notability and readability, it might be prudent to retain that 'rule'. --NFSreloaded (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240707163800","author":"NFSreloaded","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-NFSreloaded-20240707163800-Dajasj-20240707162900","replies":["c-Dajasj-20240707164000-NFSreloaded-20240707163800"]}}-->
Ah, yeah, that was a mistake! Dajasj (talk) 16:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240707164000","author":"Dajasj","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Dajasj-20240707164000-NFSreloaded-20240707163800","replies":[]}}-->