The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 ^talk 17:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-15T17:36:00.000Z","author":"Music1201","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Music1201-2016-07-15T17:36:00.000Z-Requested_move_25_June_2016","replies":[]}}-->

Template:Chief of the Army Staff India → Template:Chief of the Army Staff (India) – As per WP:MILMOS and WP:PRECISION, while specifying a particular name of a place in the article's name to avoid confusion/disambiguation, it must be put in the brackets but must not be directly suffixed as it is now. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 16:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Omni Flames (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z","author":"KC97","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z-Requested_move_25_June_2016","replies":["c-Jenks24-2016-07-05T09:49:00.000Z-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z","c-Andy_M._Wang-2016-07-06T00:04:00.000Z-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z","c-JFG-2016-07-06T09:31:00.000Z-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Moving templates is a largely pointless practice that benefits no one because they are editor-facing and thus do not need to be titled according to things like our MoS. Jenks24 (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-05T09:49:00.000Z","author":"Jenks24","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jenks24-2016-07-05T09:49:00.000Z-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
• @Jenks24: Wikipedia:Template namespace#Template names may be a reason to move. Though I'd add that if this template had many thousand transclusions, a template move might be unnecessary server strain. But then again, TPROT level templates have been moved to more English-conformant and readable names over the years, including those with close to millions of transclusions. (This one has only 29). I say, move, but don't feel strongly either way. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 00:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-06T00:04:00.000Z","author":"Andy M. Wang","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Andy_M._Wang-2016-07-06T00:04:00.000Z-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jenks24-2016-07-06T06:53:00.000Z-Andy_M._Wang-2016-07-06T00:04:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Andy\u00a0W."}}-->
  • I understand that other people feel differently to me about this issue, it's only my personal opinion and that's why I didn't oppose. I think in cases like this, where the template is readily identifiable at either title, starting a RM is a waste of admin/page mover time and I will continue to discourage the practice. Jenks24 (talk) 06:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-06T06:53:00.000Z","author":"Jenks24","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Jenks24-2016-07-06T06:53:00.000Z-Andy_M._Wang-2016-07-06T00:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
• Neutral – @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Like Jenks24 I don't see the benefit of making minor changes to template titles. However the target name is free so you can move the template yourself if you wish. — JFG ^talk 09:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-06T09:31:00.000Z","author":"JFG","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JFG-2016-07-06T09:31:00.000Z-KC97-2016-06-25T16:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.