Template talk:1947 shipwrecks

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Ourang_Medan-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan","c-Dunarc-2016-09-06T13:36:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan"],"text":"Ourang Medan","linkableTitle":"Ourang Medan"}-->

Ourang Medan

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Ourang_Medan-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan","c-Dunarc-2016-09-06T13:36:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Ourang_Medan-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan","c-Dunarc-2016-09-06T13:36:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan"],"text":"Ourang Medan","linkableTitle":"Ourang Medan"}-->

Should the Ourang Medan incident be included, given the article suggests there is considerable doubt that the ship existed? Alternatively might a note be added to indicate that it is a disputed shipwreck?

Dunarc (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z","author":"Dunarc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dunarc-2016-08-05T19:30:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan","replies":[]}}-->

Also the 1947 date is itself questionable, as the article notes 1948 has been suggested and there is evidence of the story being in circulated in 1940.

Dunarc (talk) 13:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-09-06T13:36:00.000Z","author":"Dunarc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dunarc-2016-09-06T13:36:00.000Z-Ourang_Medan","replies":[]}}-->