PROFILPELAJAR.COM

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Classical Greece and Rome

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome

Military history: Maritime / Roman & Byzantine

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force

Rome

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome

Ships

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Phoenicia

This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129211600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles-20231129211600","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129211600-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles"],"text":"Lack of historical content at the linked articles","linkableTitle":"Lack of historical content at the linked articles"}-->

Lack of historical content at the linked articles

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129211600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles-20231129211600","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129211600-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Mathglot-20231201075200-Mathglot-20231129211600","timestamp":"20231201075200"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__2__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129211600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles-20231129211600","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129211600-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles"],"text":"Lack of historical content at the linked articles","linkableTitle":"Lack of historical content at the linked articles"}-->

One of the first things I noticed when building this and adding links to relevant articles, was that in a lot of cases, there is little or no content about antiquity in the linked articles. Take, for example, the four articles listed in the second row, labeled "Locomotion". Of those, the Sailing article has a decent few paragraphs about the topic that someone seeking some information on Sailing in antiquity might find informative. But not one of the other three articles (Paddling, Towpath, Punt (boat)) has anything at all to say about early origins. This is true also of many of the linked articles, and points out content gaps in those articles.

Maybe given the volunteer nature of the project, this shouldn't be too surprising, but it does point out some gaps in our coverage of the ancient origins of many concepts still familiar today. It's kind of an unexpected benefit of having the nav template, in that it may lead us to backfilling some important early history into a lot of articles that already exist, but lack such background currently. An understandable WP:RECENTISM bias, no doubt, but still one that shoiuld be addressed. Mathglot (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231129211600","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231129211600-Lack_of_historical_content_at_the_linked_articles","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231201075200-Mathglot-20231129211600"]}}-->

I raised this at WT:SHIPS. Mathglot (talk) 07:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC) Here. Mathglot (talk) 09:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231201075200","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231201075200-Mathglot-20231129211600","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129213500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Historians_and_archaeologists-20231129213500","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129213500-Historians_and_archaeologists"],"text":"Historians and archaeologists","linkableTitle":"Historians and archaeologists"}-->

Historians and archaeologists

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129213500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Historians_and_archaeologists-20231129213500","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129213500-Historians_and_archaeologists"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Mathglot-20231129213500-Historians_and_archaeologists","timestamp":"20231129213500"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129213500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Historians_and_archaeologists-20231129213500","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129213500-Historians_and_archaeologists"],"text":"Historians and archaeologists","linkableTitle":"Historians and archaeologists"}-->

I'm thinking that maybe we don't need the level-3 labels "Historians" and "Archaeologists"; we could maybe just drop them, and just link them all under "Scholars". (Originally, I had that label as "Historians", but that didn't work, because of the large number of scholars contributing to the field who really weren't.) Mathglot (talk) 21:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231129213500","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231129213500-Historians_and_archaeologists","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129213700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Piracy-20231129213700","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129213700-Piracy"],"text":"Piracy","linkableTitle":"Piracy"}-->

Piracy

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129213700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Piracy-20231129213700","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129213700-Piracy"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Mathglot-20231129213700-Piracy","timestamp":"20231129213700"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231129213700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Piracy-20231129213700","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231129213700-Piracy"],"text":"Piracy","linkableTitle":"Piracy"}-->

I couldn't find too many articles to link under this group label, and I'm not sure if I haven't looked hard enough, or we don't cover the topic adequately, or there just isn't that much in the historical record about piracy in antiquity and so Wikipedia just reflects that in our coverage. Should we get rid of this group and move those two links somewhere else, or try to expand it? Mathglot (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231129213700","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231129213700-Piracy","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231130093400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups-20231130093400","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231130093400-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups"],"text":"Vertical height and collapsible groups","linkableTitle":"Vertical height and collapsible groups"}-->

Vertical height and collapsible groups

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231130093400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups-20231130093400","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231130093400-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Mathglot-20231221120600-Mathglot-20231130093400","timestamp":"20231221120600"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__2__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231130093400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups-20231130093400","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231130093400-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups"],"text":"Vertical height and collapsible groups","linkableTitle":"Vertical height and collapsible groups"}-->

Due to the vertical size of the template, I'm thinking of switching to template {{Navbox with collapsible groups}}. See for example, Nav box {{India topics}} at the bottom of the India article, or the second and third nav boxes at the bottom of Cleopatra. This template is still quite a bit smaller than nay of those, but it might be approaching the length where collapsing parts of it might help. Mathglot (talk) 09:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231130093400","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231130093400-Vertical_height_and_collapsible_groups","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231221120600-Mathglot-20231130093400"]}}-->

Reimplemented using collapsible groups in this edit. Mathglot (talk) 12:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231221120600","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231221120600-Mathglot-20231130093400","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231130202100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Galleys_and_polyremes-20231130202100","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231130202100-Galleys_and_polyremes"],"text":"Galleys and polyremes","linkableTitle":"Galleys and polyremes"}-->

Galleys and polyremes

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231130202100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Galleys_and_polyremes-20231130202100","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231130202100-Galleys_and_polyremes"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Mathglot-20231130202100-Galleys_and_polyremes","timestamp":"20231130202100"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231130202100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Galleys_and_polyremes-20231130202100","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231130202100-Galleys_and_polyremes"],"text":"Galleys and polyremes","linkableTitle":"Galleys and polyremes"}-->

Currently, bireme, trireme, quad, etc. are under polyreme, as they should be, which puts them into parentheses as a subgroup of polyreme. However, as they are all types of galley, rightly they should be under that, too, but that would give two levels of parentheses, but would that be too confusing for a reader? Ideas? Mathglot (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231130202100","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231130202100-Galleys_and_polyremes","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231221120400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wrecks_and_relics-20231221120400","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231221120400-Wrecks_and_relics"],"text":"Wrecks and relics","linkableTitle":"Wrecks and relics"}-->

Wrecks and relics

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231221120400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wrecks_and_relics-20231221120400","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231221120400-Wrecks_and_relics"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Mathglot-20231221120400-Wrecks_and_relics","timestamp":"20231221120400"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mathglot-20231221120400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wrecks_and_relics-20231221120400","replies":["c-Mathglot-20231221120400-Wrecks_and_relics"],"text":"Wrecks and relics","linkableTitle":"Wrecks and relics"}-->

At this writing, this is part of group 6, Research and education; but I'm wondering if it would be better to locate it under group 3, History? Mathglot (talk) 12:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231221120400","author":"Mathglot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathglot-20231221120400-Wrecks_and_relics","replies":[]}}-->