PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Template:Inappropriate comment/doc

Shortcut

Tag, collapse, or remove comments under WP:TPG as an alternative to a revert of another's comment. This template should not be used by involved parties to end a discussion over the objections of other editors.

Usage

There are three parameters, "action", "reason", and "comment".

action
Specifies what should be done with the comment, there are five options: "remove", "collapse", "tag over", "tag", and "no action". The "remove", "collapse", and "no action" may be used for either individual or groups of comments; while "tag" and "tag over" should only be used for single comments.
reason
Additional optional reason for the action taken.
comment
The comment which you wish to tag, collapse, or remove.
{{Inappropriate comment
|action=
|reason=
|comment=

}}

Examples

{{Inappropriate comment
|action=...
|reason=[[WP:TALKOFFTOPIC]]
|comment=This article about bananas says that they may be yellow. But isn't all colour an illusion in the mind of the observer? It is my belief that humans are the only living organisms on the planet whose minds have the true quality of colour to them, we cannot put ourselves in the mind of other animals. Have you considered how the world might look to us if we did not have the concept of colour? ~~~~
}}

remove

This article about bananas says that they may be yellow. But isn't all colour an illusion in the mind of the observer? It is my belief that humans are the only living organisms on the planet whose minds have the true quality of colour to them, we cannot put ourselves in the mind of other animals. Have you considered how the world might look to us if we did not have the concept of colour? Example (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

collapse

This article about bananas says that they may be yellow. But isn't all colour an illusion in the mind of the observer? It is my belief that humans are the only living organisms on the planet whose minds have the true quality of colour to them, we cannot put ourselves in the mind of other animals. Have you considered how the world might look to us if we did not have the concept of colour? Example (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

tag over

This article about bananas says that they may be yellow. But isn't all colour an illusion in the mind of the observer? It is my belief that humans are the only living organisms on the planet whose minds have the true quality of colour to them, we cannot put ourselves in the mind of other animals. Have you considered how the world might look to us if we did not have the concept of colour? Example (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment tagged inappropriate under talk page guidelines. WP:TALKOFFTOPIC

tag

This article about bananas says that they may be yellow. But isn't all colour an illusion in the mind of the observer? It is my belief that humans are the only living organisms on the planet whose minds have the true quality of colour to them, we cannot put ourselves in the mind of other animals. Have you considered how the world might look to us if we did not have the concept of colour? Example (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[Inappropriate under WP:TPG - WP:TALKOFFTOPIC]

no action

This article about bananas says that they may be yellow. But isn't all colour an illusion in the mind of the observer? It is my belief that humans are the only living organisms on the planet whose minds have the true quality of colour to them, we cannot put ourselves in the mind of other animals. Have you considered how the world might look to us if we did not have the concept of colour? Example (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

See also


Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.