Talk:Sun
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Sun is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sun is part of the Solar System series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 20, 2006, and on March 20, 2025. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inside the sun image
I can’t see the image fully ~2026-93758-4 (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- Do you mean the "Structure" image? Is it cut off somehow? —Antonissimo (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2026
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the Sun#Formation heading there is the following text. This edit should be made to add a link to a relevant article:
| − | The stars [[HD 162826]] and [[HD 186302]] share similarities with the Sun and are hypothesised to be | + | The stars [[HD 162826]] and [[HD 186302]] share similarities with the Sun and are hypothesised to be [[solar sibling]]s, formed in the same molecular cloud as the Sun. |
The stars HD 162826 and HD 186302 share similarities with the Sun and are hypothesised to be solar siblings, formed in the same molecular cloud as the Sun. Ronjohnbonpon (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. However I have chosen a different path: I deleted this content. The specific candidates have been disputed. I think for an article at this level we should focus on more settled science about the Sun. We should update solar siblings as new studies have been published but no review that list confirmed sibling, more like questions if it is even possible to identify them. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Chemical composition
I find it very hard to believe that the sun at present contains more hydrogen and less helium than at the time it was formed. After all it spent a few billion years converting hydrogen into helium See Sun#Composition ~2026-42779-07 (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- The article does not give the current composition of the Sun as far as I can tell. Numbers in the first paragraph for H and He are for the photosphere, and near the end the article claims the photosphere composition is near the primordial composition. So that is what leads to your observation.
- The end of the first paragraph seems to give composition of the interior but not for H / He. The middle of the section claims changes in composition due to fusion. All around a mess. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2026
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Physical characteristics tab.
Please change the Volume value from 1.412×1018 km3 to 1.410×1018 km3.So that it correlated with the existing Equatorial radius value of 695,700 km. ~2026-43091-55 (talk) 23:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. I added a reference that gives the current value. I also changed the radius value and some temperatures. They were sourced to
- Prša, A., Harmanec, P., Torres, G., Mamajek, E., Asplund, M., Capitaine, N., ... & Stewart, S. G. (2016). Nominal values for selected solar and planetary quantities: IAU 2015 resolution B3. The Astronomical Journal, 152(2), 41.
- which has a table with the values and a note:
these values should not be considered the true solar/planetary properties. They should be understood as conversion values only.
Johnjbarton (talk) 02:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.


