The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2010/06/snowclones Snowclones The X of Y - The Economist

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 19 August 2006, see discussion. Delete, 31 July 2004‎, see discussion.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

I dont know why two smartasses cited disliked titles like "Chasing Amy", but this construction is a regular word collocation with no special meaning implied or parallels drawn, in contrast to snowclones. I can find dozens of such cliches in titles; right off my head : "X and Me" All pages with titles containing and me. You may try "intitle" feature yourslef, like, All pages with titles containing Adventure in. Wikipedia is a great tool :-) Lembit Staan (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised not to find Hunter S. Thompson's Fear and Loathing influence as used in his books Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and ...on_the_Campaign_Trail.

It is commonly used as a title template, IMO more widely than some existing examples in the entry, particularly (but not exclusively) in journalism.

For example searching with an exclusion for Thompson's own works produces far too many results to list but a selection of disparate uses includes:

• "Criminal Minds" Fear and Loathing (TV Episode 2007) - IMDb
• Fear and loathing | September 11 2001 | The Guardian
• Fear and Loathing on the Oche: A Gonzo Journey Through the World of Championship Darts
• Fear and loathing in Palmerston | Star News
• Fear and Loathing in Elko - Rolling Stone
• Fear and loathing at the Arkansas legislature: The anti-LGBT laws
• Fear and Loathing of the English Passive
• Fear and Loathing in Senegal
• Fear and self-loathing in Animal Crossing: New Horizons
• Fear and loathing, and tax accountants - afr.com
• Fear and Loathing of Central Banks in America
• Fear and loathing in the hunt for gravitational waves | Science

Sometimes the form is varied slightly, dropping minor words as in Fear, loathing and the French police - spiked or Marshal Law: Fear and Loathing

Your thoughts on whether this is an appropriate section to add?  Question:

Pauldavey (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a snowclone (plz see its definition), just a catchy cliche, such as "fast and furious", "fire and forget", "once upon a time", etc. In any case, you have to find some reliable source which explains what kind of phrase it is. Then you may probably find another place in wikipedia for it. If nobody discusses this phrase in detail, then it does not belong to wikipedia. Lembit Staan (talk) 23:19, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which definition please Lembit? I think it ticks boxes for all three of cliché, phrasal template and is used and recognized in multiple variants (as per article).

Perhaps I should have stated it as "Fear and Loathing ...[in/at/on] X" etc. (as per the examples), to make it clear it's a phrasal component not a fixed idiom. Is it different or inferior to "In space, no one can hear you X" or "X is the new Y" etc? Pauldavey (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. Please reread my reply. You need to cite sources. Lembit Staan (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent reverts:

Eskimo languages are a wider group of languages than Inuit languages. Therefore the terms are not interchangeable. Lembit Staan (talk) 05:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it doesn't matter how broad one term is in comparison to another. slurs are never accurate ways to refer to a group, save for when directly quoting. either come up with a better term than Inuit (which e****o isn't), put the slur back with indication that this is the word used in context of the (by the way false) claim about the number of words they have for snow, or leave it this time. 2600:1700:17F0:A4A0:24CB:890C:D989:4E05 (talk) 00:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raise the issue on Talk:Eskimo words for snow not here. – The Grid (talk) 15:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usually referring to a game with noticeable bug(s) sarcastically - Ersonpay (talk page) 05:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is also an often re-interpreted phrase Tradukisto2 (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s just puns 24.45.255.214 (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

often nonsensical and humorous play on the innuendo of "she ebbin on my nezer til i scrooge." notably popular on tumblr and reddit despite originating on twitter. a notable example is the [EXTREMELY LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER] twitter thread and subsequent viral dub. (this is most likely NOT the original source of this video as it's been reposted to high heaven so it's difficult to find the original upload to say the least)

she wiki on my pee til i dia 63.239.193.154 (talk) 08:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i thought wikipedia is neutral and for everybody, why is there so much using black as an example and putting in american political topics? 2A0A:A540:42A0:0:E9AF:B7EF:8AD1:5019 (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originally "The strange death of liberal England", this phrase has been widely reused in different forms to create all kinds of new titles. 82.37.1.24 (talk) 14:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]