This article was nominated for deletion on 21 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Slovenia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Slovenia to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks you can do (watch): Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl) Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308 Expand: Education in Slovenia Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band) Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture Help assess the quality of 37 unassessed articles Take/Add requested photographs

This article should be deleted, as the institution simply doesn't exist, neither legally nor functionally. There is only the National Assembly and the National Council, but they are separate and independent bodies. They only share the same building, which is called the Parliament. edolen1 14:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-03T14:28:00.000Z","author":"Edolen1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Edolen1-2007-10-03T14:28:00.000Z-The_Slovenian_Parliament_as_an_institution_doesn't_exist","replies":["c-Alib-2009-05-03T14:23:00.000Z-Edolen1-2007-10-03T14:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

This is correct, although it is not unusual for a bicameral legislature to not be institutionalized as such (compare, e. g., the parliament of Austria). Still, I would propose to insert an explanatory note, so as to address this issue. --Alib (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-05-03T14:23:00.000Z","author":"Alib","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Alib-2009-05-03T14:23:00.000Z-Edolen1-2007-10-03T14:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Eleassar-2010-12-16T17:18:00.000Z-Alib-2009-05-03T14:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

The article should cover the history since the convention of the first Slovenian parliament in 1945. Constitutions changed a lot since then. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 17:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-16T17:18:00.000Z","author":"Eleassar","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Eleassar-2010-12-16T17:18:00.000Z-Alib-2009-05-03T14:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

An image used in this article, File:Slovenian Parliament Panorama 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-24T18:14:00.000Z","author":"CommonsNotificationBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CommonsNotificationBot-2011-08-24T18:14:00.000Z-File:Slovenian_Parliament_Panorama_2010.jpg_Nominated_for_Deletion","replies":[]}}-->

An image used in this article, File:Slovenian Parliament 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-20T11:40:00.000Z","author":"CommonsNotificationBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CommonsNotificationBot-2011-09-20T11:40:00.000Z-File:Slovenian_Parliament_2010.jpg_Nominated_for_Deletion","replies":[]}}-->

I removed the statement by France Bučar, as it doesn't relate strongly to the topic, as it is more about politics in general than just the parliament. Also, I imagine similar opinions can be found about the politics of most democratic states. User332572385 (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-02-09T18:23:00.000Z","author":"User332572385","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-User332572385-2014-02-09T18:23:00.000Z-Removed_France_Bu\u010dar_statement","replies":[]}}-->

• According to the June 2012 statement by France Bučar, one of the founding fathers of Slovenian democracy and independence, the democracy in Slovenia is very weak, with the power concentrated in the hands of a few people, as in the time of the Socialist Republic of Slovenia before 1991, and the Slovenian Parliament is only a formal institution.^[1]