This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gambling Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Gambling To-do: edit history watch purge Current collaborations: Improve an article to FA Improve an article to A Help with the Gambling articles needing attention. Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner. The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated. Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

What other material do the manufacturers use other than latex for the scratch-offs? I never heard anyone with a latex allergy not using instant tickets.Shippo (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I like that they tell us that the material is latex, but is there other material and how do they get it on there..and how do they print on the place that is covering the hidden content, and is it possible to make your own scratch card at home?

Are there companies that make the stuff that you would use to hide that part of your card that would dry and you can scratch off later (like if you were a teacher and wanted to generate some professional looking scratch cards for the students of your class) without having to know the entire layout up front?

Would it be like a Presto Magix kind of application where you buy sheets of the stuff and scratch it on to the part of your card that you want to hide? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shippo (talk • contribs)

Try Wikipedia:Reference Desk. ›mysid (☎∆✎) 02:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The lottery played in Seattle, etc, is now correctly known as Washington's Lottery. 216.179.123.103 (talk) 19:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

so in the line 'Such cards are vulnerable to attack by devices which allow individuals to see through the concealing substance without physically disturbing it.' : is it saying there are known methods to see through the 'latex' on scratch cards? all or just certain kinds? If so where is the reference for that and what are the supposed methods for seeing through it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.160.131.17 (talk) 08:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I know that bringing up regional dialect with regard to article nomenclature is a recipe for flamewar, but where the heck do they say "scratchcard"? In Massachusetts, where they're extremely popular, I have only ever heard scratch ticket. 76.19.26.248 (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pretty much the whole of the UK for one thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.140.66 (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes. "Scratchcard" is prettymuch the sole term for these in the UK - Ive never even heard of "Scratch Ticket" 94.168.179.213 (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

There does not seem to be any info about the scratch cards that are typically included in magazines, for example, the ones that typically offer holidays, cars, cash prizes, and reek of a scam. Are they illegal is certain areas? (I heard they were illegal in Denmark.) Vuvuzela2010 (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

• New England Legends Lotto Ticket - found discarded - Olneyville, Rhode Island - 2008.tif
• Treasure Lotto ticket - found discarded - Olneyville, Rhode Island - 2008.tif
• Wild Card ticket - found discarded - Olneyville, Rhode Island - 2008.tif

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply