This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Arrowverse Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Arrowverse task force (assessed as Low-importance). Comics: DC Comics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by DC Comics work group. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Considering that unlike Oliver, Sara played a major role on more than one show in the Arrowverse, I think her section should be split in two parts. One for Arrow and then for Legends of Tomorrow. Any thoughts? --PanagiotisZois (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-14T00:27:00.000Z","author":"PanagiotisZois","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T00:27:00.000Z-Storyline","replies":["c-Favre1fan93-2016-12-14T06:20:00.000Z-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T00:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

This would be fine. However, the amount of info IP @97.91.239.164: is doing here is very inappropriate and unnecessary. Smaller paragraphs for each season, such as what is done on the Oliver Queen (Arrow) article is sufficient. The notability for this article is the outside commentary, not a complete rehashing of her plot points. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-14T06:20:00.000Z","author":"Favre1fan93","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Favre1fan93-2016-12-14T06:20:00.000Z-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T00:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T08:18:00.000Z-Favre1fan93-2016-12-14T06:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

I understand. Can I still use that information however? I do intend on making it shorter and leaving only necessary elements in. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 08:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-14T08:18:00.000Z","author":"PanagiotisZois","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T08:18:00.000Z-Favre1fan93-2016-12-14T06:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-Favre1fan93-2016-12-14T17:50:00.000Z-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T08:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, synopsis of appearances in episodes is fine. What you had added before the IP started editing was completely fine in my eyes. The only issue I had, and will continue to have, is if they are "play-by-play" minutia detail dumps of plot that the IP was doing. All of what they tried to add would need to be severely cut down, that I don't know if it would even be worth using what they added and trimming. It might be best to just start fresh. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-14T17:50:00.000Z","author":"Favre1fan93","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Favre1fan93-2016-12-14T17:50:00.000Z-PanagiotisZois-2016-12-14T08:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I see a page with about 85 % plot information and barely any real world info to justify existing on its own. Is there more information out there to fill this article?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-14T16:43:00.000Z","author":"Bignole","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bignole-2017-03-14T16:43:00.000Z-Page_notability","replies":[]}}-->