This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rolling can be seen as pure rotation. Say, a sphere is rolling on the flat table. At an instant, the sphere can be "seen" as if it is rotating about the point of contact. But as time passes, that "physical point"(or molecule, atom, etc.) changes (due to acceleration of the contact point) into some other. But, if we again see only at "an instant" then we again have rotation about contact point but not about same "physical point" but about same "geometrical point". Hence, the axis is changing all the time but if we see at an instant the sphere can be regarded as rotating about the point of contact.

My doubt is whether it is okay to call this motion as "pure rotation" about the contact point, even if "physical point" does not stay the same? the answer is hidden in the definition of Rotation. According to Wikipedia, rotation is just about an axis, from which I think it can also be about an axis where physical point is varying. But I don't know the internationally accepted definition of Rotation in Physics. Text-books were not of much help.

-Udaya Maurya — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.20.121 (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

That last paragraph in the article needs a rewrite to improve the grammar to readability standards.(DF) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.230.222.68 (talk) 19:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply