Talk:Red

Former good article nomineeRed was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

Violet??

I thought red is opposite to green; I could be wrong though can someone please explain? Thanks in advance. 46.121.169.63 (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC) PLEASE DELETE THIS! this is is to prove to students that people can not post junk on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-20774-90 (talk) 22:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page is for discussing improvements to the article, not general questions. But in short there are different ways of organizing colours, each better or worse suited for various purposes (painting, printing, digitization, stage lighting, and so on). See Color wheel for some examples.—Odysseus1479 19:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

"List of terms associated with the color red" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of terms associated with the color red has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 22 § List of terms associated with the color red until a consensus is reached. 1isall (talk/contribs) 17:08, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

What is the reason for this article not including an etymology section (like other color articles do)? ZFT (talk) 22:50, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.