This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is inappropriate, to be short (as this also). There are some 5-6 external links. Maybe reading them would help to define wich are it's main fields, or at least, what is it's definition :) --VinceB 21:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. The sections that need attention may be noted below.

I added an 'expert attention' tag. Cleanup is required, but I don't have the time of knowledge to provide it. Martpol 13:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It seems likeit would be easy enough to clean up, but the explanations provided make little sense based on American ways of operating things. It was clearly written from a more european point of view. It needs to be made more generalized with a more worldwide worldview. --Lendorien 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I will be spending the months of June-December 2008 studying the field of political communications at both the University level and in a Non-Profit Organization. Perhaps, during and at the end of this time I will be able to contribute a high level of substance to this article. Hopefully, by then someone will have already added to it, if not, I will be here expanding and revising.

I will touch on the following:
Study of and fields of Political Communications
New Media (a.k.a use of YouTube, blogs, podcasts, and websites in recent campaigns)
Political Communications in the United States
Political Communications in the United Kingdom

--Benchmark.stl (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do follow up on this! Your work on it would be much appreciated! --Lendorien (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the section on the role of social media needs attention. The wording here suggests an opinion and could be adjusted ( ex: "need to establish themselves..." and "social media will be more important than traditional media..."). New15txstate (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply