Talk:Physical memory
This should definitely NOT be merged... -- 213.122.51.52 13:20, 22 January 2006
They should not be merged. On the other hand, the entry for Physical memory should lose some details that really belong to Primary memory. DHR 05:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The articles should be merged. Physical memory is a tiny, vague, stub that offers nothing next to Primary storage. Physical memory should immediately be made a redirect to Primary storage. --G0zer 07:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
(My opinion is pro-merge) In my experience I have always seen physical memory, and primary storage used interchangably. Additionally, I know of no difference between these forms of memory. If there IS a difference, they should probably remain separate. If there is NO difference, they should be merged. I think the question is how different these terms actually are. --Pyrofysh 13:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I think we should first discuss the difference of the two, then decide whether the articles should be merged. 0612 05:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
My opinion is PRO-MERGE. As a person of limited computer knowledge, who is using Wikipedia as an excellent source for learning, my vote is to merge. If there is a difference in these terms, it should be specified, but in any event, a person such as myself, seeking to learn, needs to see both terms presented together, either to learn the distinctions, or simply to learn the shared meaning. Bridgefinder 8/20/06 It should be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bridgefinder (talk • contribs) 08:25, August 20, 2006
Merge as long as primary storage is always physical memory. (I've also added the merge tag to Primary storage to get more opinions.) Tocharianne 19:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed: Merging I agree, the stub lacks anything well sourced. If someone was trying to define something different they should have written more about it. As a computer professional I don't see the uniqueness of physical memory. Alan.ca 07:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.