This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Newspapers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Florida Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is it called The Beacon? Not very imaginative, imho. The university has a Tower, and an airport past, so why was the name Beacon chosen? Feindfahrt (talk) 17:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-07-04T17:19:00.000Z","author":"Feindfahrt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Feindfahrt-2009-07-04T17:19:00.000Z-The_Beacon?","replies":[]}}-->

I have objections with this edit for the following reasons. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Aranae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Recent_revert_conflict","replies":["c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-1","c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-2","c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-3"]}}-->

1. I'm not convinced the Giant Chipmunk (Tamias minor) is legitimate. Anyone have a reference? --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Aranae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
2. Image:Chipmunk 222.jpg - Species is not identified. Are we looking to encourage hand feeding of wild animals? The animal is not particularly visible. There are better images at commons than this. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Aranae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-1","replies":[]}}-->
3. Image:Chipmunk 210.jpg - Species is not identified. If any should stay, it should be this one. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Aranae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-2","replies":[]}}-->
4. Image:Chipmunk 254.jpg - Species is not identified. Poor quality image. This adds nothing to the article. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Aranae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-Aranae-2007-09-06T00:36:00.000Z-3","replies":[]}}-->

I note that the edit has been restored. Would you please explain why this information should be included? --Aranae 03:11

I love my Chipmunk,"Spootie" as my pet but she can be a pest —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.102.185.17 (talk) 00:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-11-27T00:39:00.000Z","author":"65.102.185.17","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-65.102.185.17-2008-11-27T00:39:00.000Z-Recent_revert_conflict","replies":[]}}-->