Talk:Ocean Park Cable Car

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Source_quality-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z-Source_quality"],"text":"Source quality","linkableTitle":"Source quality"}-->

Source quality

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Source_quality-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z-Source_quality"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z-Source_quality","timestamp":"2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Source_quality-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z-Source_quality"],"text":"Source quality","linkableTitle":"Source quality"}-->

Of the three sources added recently, one was a Tripod personal site (which I've removed per WP:SPS) and the other two have only one-line passing mentions of the cable car. These would be considered weak sources at the best of times, but as the only sources in the article they fail to satisfy WP:GNG on significant coverage: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material". We need better sources than these to sustain the article. – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 06:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z","author":"NULL","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-NULL-2012-04-06T06:31:00.000Z-Source_quality","replies":[]}}-->