"Purely mathematical research involving artificial neural nets has demonstrated that the volume secretion of neurotransmitters such as adrenaline during near-death trauma induces hallucination [7]. Then, as simulated cell apoptosis progresses, neural nets perform pattern completion upon their own internal damage, at first generating the equivalent of life review, and thereafter producing ever more creative, fantasy-like experience before fading to black.[8] Due to the accelerated progression of both true and false memories with cascading neural damage, we may expect dying neurobiology to experience time-dilation and a subjective feel of forever".
Utter nonsense added to the lead by Perky28. His source is this weird paper [1], Virtual input” phenomena within the death of a simple pattern associator by S. L. Thaler. This paper does not mention NDE's. It is off-topic to being adding it to an article on near-death experiences. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 03:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T03:21:00.000Z","author":"Skeptic from Britain","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skeptic_from_Britain-2018-02-16T03:21:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Skeptic_from_Britain-2018-02-16T03:23:00.000Z-Skeptic_from_Britain-2018-02-16T03:21:00.000Z"]}}-->
These mathematical studies couldn't be more relevant to this article, and yes, they have been published in the Journal of Near-Death Experience, as well as being discussed in the press (e.g., Scientific American). The PubMed article does discuss the hallucination accompanying a traumatized brain and is therefore extremely relevant. ...There, without any profanity, unlike the style of the Skeptic Brit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perky28 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T16:52:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-16T16:52:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-16T17:37:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-16T16:52:00.000Z"]}}-->
What in your opinion is UNDUE? I guess anything outside your ideology conveniently fits that definition. Besides, several secondary references have been included (e.g., Yam, Ricciardiello, Young-Mason). So, throw the baby out with the bathwater, book burning at midnight, and don't forget your torch! COI, I don't see any COI? This is wanton vandalism!!!Perky28 (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T17:49:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-16T17:49:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-16T17:55:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-16T17:49:00.000Z"]}}-->
Jytdog, it seems that your editing privilege has been revoked on several occasions. Could it be that you are vandalizing articles based upon your own particular world view? Wikipedia should not be based upon bullying.Perky28 (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T18:15:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-16T18:15:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
Jytdog, Wikipedia frowns upon Railroading (POV Railroading).Perky28 (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T18:23:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-16T18:23:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-16T18:47:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-16T18:23:00.000Z","c-Jytdog-2018-02-16T20:03:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-16T18:23:00.000Z","c-Perky28-2018-02-16T20:58:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-16T18:23:00.000Z"]}}-->
→No, it doesn't make sense and your use of the term "high quality" to denigrate reputable publishers is harsh, if not utterly wrong. With all DUE respect, your removal of all mentions of this pioneering work shows prejudice, especially in light of valid secondary sources from peer-reviewed journals and a book! I honestly have to ask if you have a COI and whether your enthusiasm against Thaler has motivated your draconian editing.Perky28 (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T21:33:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-16T21:33:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
But, biology is built upon physics and many physicists toil therein. He's a polymath, through and through and used to enduring the inherent turf wars between disciplines. I think he brings fresh insight in understanding NDEs, supplying the bottom-up details, in contrast to the medical community's, "well, this correlates with that, explaining everything! ..And the idea of a copyright violation is naive. Perky28 (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC). not Perky!__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
PS - Who says his physics research was good? This could be another one of your faulty conclusions based on little or no analysis.Perky28 (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z-Computers-1","replies":[]}}-->
As for one of Thaler's papers you link to:
This is tinfoil hat crackpottery. Please do not pretend to us this is sound scientific research. It does not belong on an article about NDE's. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 23:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-16T23:14:00.000Z","author":"Skeptic from Britain","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skeptic_from_Britain-2018-02-16T23:14:00.000Z-Computers-1","replies":[]}}-->
Brit Skeptic, the quote makes perfect sense to me! Besides, WF2010 is not a scientific forum. Its the World Future Society, where highly technical concepts are explained from a layman's perspective, with a sprinkling of optimism and hope. Besides, you haven't quoted the content of this article related to NDEs. BTW, Bruce Grayson invited Thaler's submissions to his NDE journal three times in the 90s, so his contributions, now eradicated from this article, must be worth something.Perky28 (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z-Computers-2","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-17T02:27:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-17T00:32:00.000Z"]}}-->
Jytdog, fair enough about the patents, but I see three references to Journal of Near-Death Studies in the article as it stands:
59. Carr, Daniel (1982). "Pathophysiology of Stress-Induced Limbic Lobe Dysfunction: A Hypothesis Relevant to Near-Death Experiences". Anabiosis: The Journal of Near-Death Studies. 2: 75–89.
60. Morse, M. L; Venecia, D; Milstein, J. (1989). "Near-death experiences: A neurophysiological explanatory model". Journal of Near-Death Studies. 8: 45–53.
61. Saavedra-Aguilar, J.C.; Gómez-Jeria, Juan S. (1989). "A Neurobiological Model for Near-Death Experiences". Journal of Near-Death Studies. 7 (4): 205–222. doi:10.1007/bf01074007.
Thaler has three peer-reviewed papers in this same journal that were invited by no less than Bruce Grayson. Don't these count?-
1. Thaler, S. L., Death of a gedanken creature, Journal of Near-Death Studies, 13(3), Spring 1995.
2. Thaler, S. L., The death dream and near-death darwinism, Journal of Near-Death Studies, 15(1), Fall 1996.
3. Thaler, S. L., The emerging intelligence and its critical look at us, Journal of Near-Death Studies, 17(21), 1998.
Also, a Scientific American article is referenced in the current WP article, written by one of the magazine's staff reporters, Charles Choi, "Peace of mind: nde now found to have a scientific explanation."
I would think that the Thaler reference,
Yam, P., "Daisy, Daisy" Do computers have near-death experience, Scientific American, May 1993,
is on par with Choi's article. Yam did connect the artificial neural network's death with that of the brain. So, it's not computers that are dying, but the neural simulations that are running on them.
Perky28 (talk) 23:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-17T23:51:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-17T23:51:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
And then what about the rebuttal to Thaler: Gunn, S., Can Artificial Intelligence Have a Near-Death Experience? A Critical Look at the Ultimate Text, March 1998 Journal of Near-Death Studies 17(1), DOI10.1023/A:1022938101875? In all fairness, this paper should also be mentioned.Perky28 (talk) 20:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-18T20:27:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-18T20:27:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
Also missing is an important reference to Jeanine Young-Mason's "Patient's Voice, Experiences of Illness." She is a Distinguished Professor from the University of Massachusetts, publishing with F. A. Davis. From what I can tell, WP has not challenged her reputation or that of her publisher. I would think this to be a reliable secondary source, that BTW references two of Thaler's now missing scientific papers dealing with death simulations in neural nets.Perky28 (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-18T21:32:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-18T21:32:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-20T21:51:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-18T21:32:00.000Z"]}}-->
No, these are not all the references I am citing. See Dispute resolution noticeboard.
No, number 3 is a secondary source. Note the fusion of other sources:
Barthes, R. (1988). The death of the author. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 166-171). New York, NY: Longman. Bloomfield, B. P. (1987). The culture of artificial intelligence. In B. P. Bloomfield (Ed.), The question of artificial intelligence (pp. 59-105). London, England: Croom Helm. Crevier, D. (1993). Al: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. New York, NY: Basic Books. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: Univer sity of Minnesota Press. Dennett, D. C. (1979). Artificial intelligence as philosophy and psychology. In M. Ringle (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives in artificial intelligence (pp. 57-80). Brighton, Eng land: Harvester. 18 SUSAN C. GUNN Ernst, J. (1992). Computer poetry: An act of disinterested communication. New Liter ary History, 23, 451-465. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (10th anni versary ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books (Original work published 1983). Hedberg, S. (1995). Where's AI hiding? Al Expert, 10(4), 17-20. Kristeva, K. (1984). The semiotic and the symbolic. In Revolution in poetic language (pp. 21-30). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Kristeva, J. (1988). The ethics of linguistics. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 223-239). New York, NY: Longman. Lebowitz, M. (1984). Creating characters in a story-telling universe. Poetics, 3, 171 194. Lund, D. H. (1985). Death and consciousness. New York, NY: Ballantine. Lyotard, J.-F. (1991). The inhuman: Reflections on time (G. Bennington and R. Bowlby, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Newell, K. B. (1983). Pattern, concrete and computer poetry: The poem as object in itself. Bucknell Review, 27, 159-173. Ringle, M. (1979). Philosophy and artificial intelligence. In M. Ringle (Ed.), Philo sophical perspectives in artificial intelligence (pp. 1-22). Brighton, England: Har vester. Rothfork, J. (1984). The ghost in the machine: Stanislaw Lem's mortal engines. Liberal and Fine Arts Review 4(1), 1-18. Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloom ington, IN: Indiana University Press. Samet, J., and Schank, R. (1984). Coherence and connectivity. Linguistics and Phi losophy, 7(1), 57-82. Saussure, F. (1988). The object of study. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Longman. Schank, R. C. (1979). Natural language, philosophy, and artificial intelligence. In M. Ringle (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives in artificial intelligence (pp. 196-224). Brighton, England: Harvester. Thaler, S. L. (1995). Death of a gedanken creature. Journal of Near-Death Studies, 13, 149-166. Waldrop, M. M. (1987). Man-made minds. New York, NY: Walker. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calcu lation. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. Wood, M. McG. (1988). Signification and simulation: Barthes' response to Turing. Para graph, 11, 210-226.
No, reference 5 appeared in the magazine, with the same theme appearing in 1995. What you are looking at is an archival copy.
No, reference 6 is definitely a secondary source.
Perky28 (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-20T22:16:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-20T22:16:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-20T22:19:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-20T22:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
There is no WP:OLD policy. Sometimes old is better. Nevertheless, the link-less morass proves this is a secondary source since it is an integration of many works. Besides, I don't think you took note of all these references, or for that matter, read the article. Also, please keep the conversation civil.Perky28 (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
"Many conflicted/advocacy editors behave this way" - Speculation, not fact.Perky28 (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z-Computers-1","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-20T23:53:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z","c-Jytdog-2018-02-20T22:22:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
Otherwise you would be claiming I've fabricated the fusion of primary sources in this secondary work. So, here it is.Perky28 (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z-Computers-2","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-20T23:52:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
I disagree. I think this discussion has been extremely helpful! Perky28 (talk) 23:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-20T23:58:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-20T23:58:00.000Z-Computers","replies":[]}}-->
Here's the definition straight from WP's policies: "A secondary source provides an author's own thinking based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains an author's analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources." Yam, Gunn, and Young-Mason, for instance, are all carrying out such processes using the primary source, Thaler's timeless, peer-reviewed work. Perky28 (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-21T00:29:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-21T00:29:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Jytdog-2018-02-21T00:43:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-21T00:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
Well, that's how WP works! ;-) Perky28 (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-21T00:46:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-21T00:46:00.000Z-Computers","replies":["c-Me_helen-2018-02-21T01:52:00.000Z-Perky28-2018-02-21T00:46:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hello Skeptic from Britain I am struggling to find reference [5] - I mean the link is wrong.
Also the book Paranormal Borderlands of Science dates back to 1981. A lot has happened since then. Are we sure we want to keep it? I did a search for James Alcock in PubMed [6] none of the indexed articles have anything to do with the subject being discussed here (near death experiences, neuroscience etc..). The author being cited is not involved in this field of research (unlike guys like Olaf Blanke, Chris French etc..)
Can't we find a better source? Your thoughts Jytdog?
Best Josezetabal (talk) 07:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-21T07:21:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-02-21T07:21:00.000Z-References_added_by_Skeptic_from_Britain","replies":["c-Skeptic_from_Britain-2018-02-21T21:47:00.000Z-Josezetabal-2018-02-21T07:21:00.000Z"]}}-->
a) Why don't you correct link [7] becase it leads nowhere (it is wrong)? You say "I am not sure why you would want it removed." You have not read my request. I asked you to correct the link. That is all. Otherwise I myself have often cited Prof French so there is no intention of removing it unless you do not correct the link.
b) regarding James Alcock I did not find a single journal publication by this person about near death experiences. Also the book is 45 years old. It has only been cited 39 times in google scholar [8] despite being around for so long. A lot has happened since then in this field of research. Nothing against him a psychologist. I am just saying to find a better more recent source. Skeptical for sure, but more solid.
Bruce Greyson (author of chapter 12 of the book I cited) has been author/co-author of more than 40 publications [9] about near death experiences. The book has been cited 455 times in google scholar [10]. The book is published by the "American Psychological Association". And finally Bruce Greyson seems quite objective when he says "Although this is a small sample, the failure of purported out-of-body experiencers, to describe the hidden targets, raises questions about the accuracy of the anecdotal reports described above"
Best Josezetabal (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-26T05:44:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-02-26T05:44:00.000Z-References_added_by_Skeptic_from_Britain","replies":["c-Skeptic_from_Britain-2018-02-26T22:52:00.000Z-Josezetabal-2018-02-26T05:44:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hello Edward321 you reverted to previous version and noted that "(rv to better version)". Can you explain why you think previous is a better version? Best Josezetabal (talk) 07:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-03-25T07:40:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-03-25T07:40:00.000Z-Reverted_edit_by_Edward321","replies":[]}}-->
The subject matter of this article seems to have way too much overlap with Near-death studies. What can be done about this?? RobP (talk) 16:33, 25 March 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-03-25T16:33:00.000Z","author":"Rp2006","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rp2006-2018-03-25T16:33:00.000Z-Near-death_studies_overlap","replies":[],"displayName":"RobP"}}-->
Hello Rp2006 according to WP:MEDRS "academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers" need to be used. Now James Alcock has not published anything on the subject. Do a research in Pubmed and you will be able to see it for yourself.
Besides Wikipedia requires to use up to date evidence as per WP:MEDDATE and the book is super old
Best Josezetabal (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-04-03T05:55:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-04-03T05:55:00.000Z-James_Alcock","replies":[]}}-->
Hello 82.132.226.248 you reverted to previous version and wrote "(very bad fringe pushing ...)". I would appreciate more explanations as to why and how my edit was fringe pushing. Thank-you in advance Best Josezetabal (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-05-06T12:45:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-05-06T12:45:00.000Z-reverted_edit_by_82.132.226.248","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, 5 days ago User:DagosNavy added a information to the article relating to the sequence of events in near death experiences citing a 2017 news article which was reverted by User:Jytdog an hour later since they found the citation of popular media coverage of primary sources on Wikipedia as against norms. Today, I became aware of the change made by DagosNavy through an email as I am watching the Near-death experience page. I agreed with Jytdog's revision and decided I could improve the article by adding back DagosNavy's edit while replacing the citation with a citation of the primary source, which I used Apoc2400's DOI Wikipedia refrence generator to create. 21 minutes later User:Alexbrn undid my edit with the note "Rv. junk source" using Twinkle. I am unsure what the meaning of "junk source" is in this context, my citation was of an original paper published in what recently became the most cited journal in Psychology according to Cornel's annual Journal Citation Reports[17]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Editor's Apprentice (talk • contribs) 18:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-08-20T18:29:00.000Z","author":"The Editor's Apprentice","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Editor's_Apprentice-2018-08-20T18:29:00.000Z-On_the_validity_of_adding_the_citation_relating_to_the_order_of_events_in_NDE's","replies":["c-Alexbrn-2018-08-20T19:00:00.000Z-The_Editor's_Apprentice-2018-08-20T18:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
I added... The most famous example of a NDE was Jesus' Crucifixion which he miraculously survived. 2601:580:10D:A722:BDD4:5ACC:D85A:B64F (talk) 14:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-08-28T14:33:00.000Z","author":"2601:580:10D:A722:BDD4:5ACC:D85A:B64F","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2601:580:10D:A722:BDD4:5ACC:D85A:B64F-2018-08-28T14:33:00.000Z-Jesus_had_a_Near-Death_Experience","replies":["c-PaleoNeonate-2018-08-29T04:16:00.000Z-2601:580:10D:A722:BDD4:5ACC:D85A:B64F-2018-08-28T14:33:00.000Z"]}}-->
"Removed Augustine's blog" for more reliable sources is another example. One could replace online material with print material from the same author, or replace this author with other authors making the same point. Instead Josezetabal rewrote the Cultural Influences section to remove any mention of cultural differences between NDEs and instead claim that they're similar between cultures. If there is dispute about this, disputants only both sides should be equally represented, rather than one side being deleted. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Near-death_experience&oldid=825242918 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:155:0:D3:BC78:2501:7E57:E32B (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-15T11:59:00.000Z","author":"2601:155:0:D3:BC78:2501:7E57:E32B","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2601:155:0:D3:BC78:2501:7E57:E32B-2019-02-15T11:59:00.000Z-Fringe_edits_from_Josezetabal","replies":[]}}-->
I noticed Josezetabal has been deleting sources that give the NDE a natural neuroscientific explanation, and this is quietly been going on for a while. He has deleted various academic or scientific sources because he claims they are not on PubMed. Just because a source is not a paper listed on PubMed does not mean it should be deleted.
This source Towards a Neuro-scientific Explanation of Near-death Experiences by Vanhaudenhuyse, was removed by Josezetabal. His reason "Vanhaudenhuyse et al. 2009 does not exist in Pubmed - also reference 56 is a Book of Intensive Care Medicine and Vanhaudenhuyse is not one of the co-authors. So all references are wrong" [18]. I just linked to the Vanhaudenhuyse source. He was co-author. I do not usually edit on this wiki and I do not want to engage in an edit war, but there appears to be some deception going on here. Reliable sources have been deleted. Rebecca Bird (talk) 18:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-24T18:44:00.000Z","author":"Rebecca Bird","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rebecca_Bird-2017-12-24T18:44:00.000Z-Fringe_edits_from_Josezetabal","replies":[]}}-->
I agree! One only needs to look at who has disappeared and who has survived the edits to identify the culprits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perky28 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-14T16:17:00.000Z","author":"Perky28","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Perky28-2018-02-14T16:17:00.000Z-Fringe_edits_from_Josezetabal","replies":[]}}-->
Adding to this discussion: Josezetabal just deleted a valid source (a book) because it was "a very old publication (45 ys old) and he has not published any scientific articles on the subject". They are basically framing this in such a way that the fringe viewpoint needs to be DISPROVED by science, else it cannot be critiqued. I reverted. RobP (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-03-25T16:37:00.000Z","author":"Rp2006","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rp2006-2018-03-25T16:37:00.000Z-Fringe_edits_from_Josezetabal","replies":["c-Josezetabal-2018-04-18T05:48:00.000Z-Rp2006-2018-03-25T16:37:00.000Z"],"displayName":"RobP"}}-->
Be aware that the same user is doing the same thing on Out-of-body experience. RobP (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-03-25T16:48:00.000Z","author":"Rp2006","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rp2006-2018-03-25T16:48:00.000Z-Fringe_edits_from_Josezetabal","replies":["c-Josezetabal-2018-04-18T05:48:00.000Z-Rp2006-2018-03-25T16:48:00.000Z"],"displayName":"RobP"}}-->
We also need to say there are multiple models and mention them, pointing out there is no solid data. Neuroscience is not the accepted or validated theory in the field of NDEs. I have read every single review article out there. I challenge you to find a consensus on a final denfinitive model. I would be curious to know in which ways writing this, is fringe pushing Best Josezetabal (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-05-20T03:48:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-05-20T03:48:00.000Z-Fringe_edits_from_Josezetabal","replies":["c-PaleoNeonate-2018-06-27T15:43:00.000Z-Josezetabal-2018-05-20T03:48:00.000Z","c-PaleoNeonate-2018-06-27T15:55:00.000Z-Josezetabal-2018-05-20T03:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
Neuroscience is not the accepted or validated theory in the field of NDEs
{{u|waddie96}} {talk}
A merge has been proposed. —PaleoNeonate – 01:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-08-21T01:14:00.000Z","author":"PaleoNeonate","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PaleoNeonate-2018-08-21T01:14:00.000Z-Merge_discussion_(Near-death_studies_into_Near-death_experience)","replies":[],"displayName":"Paleo"}}-->
Hello PaleoNeonate and thank-you for your proposal. The "Near-death studies" page is closely related to the International Association for Near-death Studies (IANDS) and the Journal of Near-Death Studies. Hence different from the Near-death experiences page I would vote against the merge Best --Josezetabal (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-10-29T20:47:00.000Z","author":"Josezetabal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josezetabal-2018-10-29T20:47:00.000Z-Merge_discussion_(Near-death_studies_into_Near-death_experience)","replies":[]}}-->
The Phenomenon NDE is already completely explained since more than a decade: In a NDE we can perceive as a conscious experience how a single stimulus(thought)is processed by the brain. With Google-search KINSEHER NDERF DENKEN_NTE a PDF with the complete explanation model is available as a free-read in German language.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:d4:724:ab20:19f8:16cf:aa90:d5e5 (talk) 06:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-08-05T06:58:00.000Z","author":"2003:D4:724:AB20:19F8:16CF:AA90:D5E5","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2003:D4:724:AB20:19F8:16CF:AA90:D5E5-2019-08-05T06:58:00.000Z-Phenomenon_Near-Death_Experience_is_already_completely_explained","replies":[]}}-->
Hello. I think this article is much better than its lead. The definition as it stands is too broad. "a personal experience associated with death or impending death" is a definition that applies to literally every single person who ever dies or comes close to dying. When NDE is used, it is used to mean a significant and purportedly spiritual event as recalled by the experiencer. This will eliminate the equally imprecise sentences that follow about "when positive" and "when negative" which failure to achieve NPOV about whether or not NDE's are a thing or not. Since the rest of the article seems pretty good, I'm assuming this has come up before, so I'm broaching the topic here before I be bold. DolyaIskrina (talk) 04:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-01-27T04:55:00.000Z","author":"DolyaIskrina","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DolyaIskrina-2020-01-27T04:55:00.000Z-Better_definition","replies":["c-PaleoNeonate-2020-02-01T23:18:00.000Z-DolyaIskrina-2020-01-27T04:55:00.000Z","c-PaleoNeonate-2020-02-01T23:33:00.000Z-DolyaIskrina-2020-01-27T04:55:00.000Z"]}}-->
"Kenneth Ring argues that attempted suicides do not lead more often to unpleasant NDEs than unintended near-death situations"
I've read and reread this, and still can't unpack all the negatives and qualifications — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.130.224.186 (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-15T13:56:00.000Z","author":"49.130.224.186","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-49.130.224.186-2021-10-15T13:56:00.000Z-What_does_this_mean?","replies":["c-Rp2006-2021-10-15T16:48:00.000Z-49.130.224.186-2021-10-15T13:56:00.000Z"]}}-->
I think it would be interesting to clarify in a new chapter or anywhere in the article about non-human Animals, weather they’ve been seen by individuals during the person’s near death experiences through research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:6E0B:2B00:5458:BA3B:7FF2:1D94 (talk) 04:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-02T04:44:00.000Z","author":"2A02:587:6E0B:2B00:5458:BA3B:7FF2:1D94","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2A02:587:6E0B:2B00:5458:BA3B:7FF2:1D94-2021-12-02T04:44:00.000Z-Animals","replies":[]}}-->
Within section “Characteristics” and subsection “Clinical circumstances” a chart labelled “ Bruce Greyson's Composition of Final NDE Scale” has column titled “Weighted Response” which appears to have incorrect information for what the responses are. Perhaps one was copied across all rows in error. The content matches fine for the first row, and possibly also other rows, but does not seem to go properly with all rows. It seems to need adjustment to correctly place the original weighted responses in each row instead of duplicating the same one for each row. 208.83.173.144 (talk) 19:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-03T19:39:00.000Z","author":"208.83.173.144","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-208.83.173.144-2022-06-03T19:39:00.000Z-Resolved:_Chart_with_incorrectly_copied_statements?","replies":[]}}-->
Statements in chart were incorrectly copied, now should be displaying correctly based on the section’s referenced pdf.
Right next to section 2.3's header, there's a somewhat eerie picture of a tunnel with light at the end of it just strangely captioned "Entering darkness, seeing the light"
Not only does this not have proper punctuation, but it doesn't fit with the article. I guess, yeah, it fits in that it is a tunnel with a light at the end of it, but it makes no attempt to explain itself in the caption, it just sits there, menacingly, like some B-rate SCP article. Is there some good reason for this picture to be here that I'm just not seeing? 2601:584:4500:6C40:4C83:8EC:F9C1:5884 (talk) 03:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220729031900","author":"2601:584:4500:6C40:4C83:8EC:F9C1:5884","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2601:584:4500:6C40:4C83:8EC:F9C1:5884-20220729031900-Uh...","replies":[]}}-->
Several chapters in Moody´s book ´Life after life´ represent the development of the physical senses since the 5th month of foetus-age: ´Feelings of Peace and Quiet´(= touch sense experiences - but acoustic+optical senses do not work now) > ´The Noise´ ( = acoustic sense is working now) > ´The dark Tunnel´(= the development of the optical sense is recalled/reactivated in a very high speed; parallel acoustic eperiencs are reported because the acoustic sense is working too) > ´The being of light´ (Light perception change from dim to brilliant) (= light perception bevore/dim and after birth/brilliant). The NDE describe that the light-perception in a tunnel-experience is at the beginning only a small spot and increase then it´s size in a very high speed: This does mean, all pictures in this NDE-article which show a tunnel with a small-light-spot at the end are wrong! When the experiences about the development of the optical senses are recalled in a very high speed (like the single fotos of a cinema-film), then the optical illusion is perceived - to move in a tunnel towards a light of increasing size. But this ´movement´ is only an illusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F2:5F17:C802:55D:D21E:8C1B:9B0E (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220730145600","author":"2003:F2:5F17:C802:55D:D21E:8C1B:9B0E","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2003:F2:5F17:C802:55D:D21E:8C1B:9B0E-20220730145600-Uh...","replies":[]}}-->
If one comes away from this article with the impression that the gates to heaven have been glimpsed by "researchers" then this article is not suitable for the encyclopedia. Per WP:FRINGE
Statements about the truth of a theory must be based upon independent reliable sources. If discussed in an article about a mainstream idea, a theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight,[1] and reliable sources must be cited that affirm the relationship of the marginal idea to the mainstream idea in a serious and substantial manner."
--— Preceding unsigned comment added by DolyaIskrina (talk • contribs) 04:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-04T04:58:00.000Z","author":"DolyaIskrina","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DolyaIskrina-2020-02-04T04:58:00.000Z-Encyclopedias_are_not_bibles,_and_Weasel_words_are_needed_when_apt","replies":[]}}-->
المركز الأوروبي لرصد المخدرات والإدمان المركز الأوروبي لرصد المخدرات والإدمان الاختصار (بالإنجليزية: EMCDDA) البلد البرتغال المقر الرئيسي لشبونة تاريخ التأسيس 1993 (established) Director Alexis Goosdeel[1] Chairman Laura D'Arrigo[2] المالية الموازنة €15.2 million (proposed)[3] عدد الموظف
Sir William Bruce The Master of Works to the Crown of Scotland was responsible for the construction, repair and maintenance of royal palaces, castles and other crown property in Scotland. The main buildings were; Holyroodhouse; Edinburgh Castle; Stirling Castle; Linlithgow Palace; and Falkland Palace. The position was roughly equivalent to that of Surveyor of the King's Works in the English Royal Household.[1] The emergence of the position reflected a shift in responsibility from the mas…
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada November 2022. Untuk film Amerika Serikat tentang Injil tersebut, lihat The Visual Bible: Matthew. Untuk film romansa, kejahatan dan seru garapan Chandran, lihat According to Mathew. The Gospel According to MatthewSutradara Pier Paolo Pasolini Produser Alfredo Bini Dit…
Ice skating discipline Synchronized skatingTeam Paradise at the 2015 Grand PrixHighest governing bodyInternational Skating UnionNicknamesprecision skating, synchroFirst Performed1956; 67 years ago (1956)CharacteristicsTeam members between 8 and 20 figure skaters including 4 alternates maximum 16 compete on the ice at once Mixed-sexMixedType Discipline of figure skating Team sport Winter sport Equipment Figure skates Venue Ice rink Figure skating rink PresenceOlympicNo[…
Este artigo não cita fontes confiáveis. Ajude a inserir referências. Conteúdo não verificável pode ser removido.—Encontre fontes: ABW • CAPES • Google (N • L • A) (Novembro de 2020) Coordenadas: 1° 40′ 12 S, 78° 38′ 44 WRiobambaNome oficial (es) San Pedro de RiobambaGeografiaPaís EquadorLista RiobambaProvíncia ChimboraçoCapital de ChimboraçoRiobambaÁrea 40,17 km2Altitude 2 750 mCoordenadas 1° 40
університет Вінницький державний педагогічний університет імені Михайла Коцюбинського ВДПУ 49°14′30″ пн. ш. 28°29′46″ сх. д. / 49.24172000002777594° пн. ш. 28.49638400002777772° сх. д. / 49.24172000002777594; 28.49638400002777772Координати: 49°14′30″ пн. ш. 28°29′46″ сх. д. /…
「十三大」重定向至此。關於十三大的其他含义,請見「十三大 (消歧义)」。 中国共产党第十三次全国代表大会人民大会堂全景又名中共十三大日期1987年10月25日 (1987-10-25)-11月1日地点北京人民大会堂主持人中共中央总书记:赵紫阳参与者中共十三大代表:1,936人特邀代表61人主要内容选举第十三届中央委员会、第十三届中央顾问委员会和第十三届中央纪律检查委员会 ←…
Not to be confused with 1st Cavalry Regiment (1855) or 1st Cavalry Division (United States). 1st Cavalry Regiment(1st Regiment of Dragoons)Coat of armsActive1833–presentCountry United States of AmericaBranch United States ArmyTypeCavalryNickname(s)1st Regiment of Dragoons[1]Motto(s)Animo Et Fide (Courageous and Faithful)Engagements First Dragoon Expedition Mexican-American War American Indian Wars American Civil War Spanish–American War Philippine–American War World War I…
BlastoiseNomor PokédexNasional #009 Sebelumnya Selanjutnya Wartortle (#008) Caterpie (#010) RegionalKanto#009Johto#239Hoenn#211Info produksiGenerasiI (Pertama) - 1996PerancangKen Sugimori Info Pokémon TipeairSpesiesPokémon cangkangKemampuanTorrent (Arus Deras) Rain Dish (Penadah Hujan) – tersembunyiTinggi1,6 m (63 in)Berat85,5 kg (188 pon)Rasio gender 87,5% jantan • 12,5% betina Evolusi SquirtleWartortleBlastoise Na…
The Execution of the Doge Marino FalieroArtistEugène DelacroixYear1825–1826MediumOil on canvasDimensions145.6 cm × 113.8 cm (57.3 in × 44.8 in)LocationWallace Collection, LondonAccessionP282 The Execution of the Doge Marino Faliero is an oil painting on canvas of 1826 by the French Romantic artist Eugène Delacroix, inspired by the 1821 play Marino Faliero, Doge of Venice by Lord Byron, which in turn was based upon events in the life of the Venetian…
العلاقات الغامبية اللبنانية غامبيا لبنان غامبيا لبنان تعديل مصدري - تعديل العلاقات الغامبية اللبنانية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين غامبيا ولبنان.[1][2][3][4][5] مقارنة بين البلدين هذه مقارنة عامة ومرجعية للدولتين: وجه المقارنة غامبيا …
أسامة حسين معلومات شخصية الاسم الكامل أسامة حسين سلطان عبد الله الميلاد 11 أغسطس 1970 (العمر 53 سنة) الكويت الطول 1.81 م (5 قدم 11 1⁄2 بوصة) مركز اللعب مُدَافِع الجنسية الكويت مسيرة الشباب سنوات فريق 1984–1986 النادي العربي المسيرة الاحترافية1 سنوات فريق م. (هـ.) 1987–2…
Iranian fighter pilot TimsarAsghar ImanianBorn(1929-08-09)9 August 1929Mashhad, PersiaDied17 March 2015(2015-03-17) (aged 85)Tehran, IranBuriedBehesht-e ZahraAllegianceIranService/branchAir ForceYears of service1950–1979RankBrigadier general[1] Asghar Imanian (Persian: اصغر ایمانیان) was an Iranian fighter pilot. He served as the commander of the Air Force from late March to early August 1979.[1] References ^ a b Nikola B. Schahgaldian, Gina Barkhordarian …
Портал:Политика Израиль Статья из серии Политическая системаИзраиля Государственный строй Основные законы Закон об Иерусалиме Закон о возвращении Закон о государстве Президент Ицхак Герцог Премьер-министр Биньямин Нетаньяху Кабинет министров обороны: Йоав Галант инос…
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: Organic hydroponics – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Organic hydroponics is a hydroponics culture system based on organic agriculture concepts that does not use synthetic inputs such as fertilizers or pesticides. In organic hydropo…
Nagpur Metro's Aqua Line metro station LAD SquareNagpur Metro stationGeneral informationLocationCorporation Colony, Gandhi Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440010Coordinates21°07′58″N 79°03′17″E / 21.13288°N 79.05473°E / 21.13288; 79.05473Owned byMaharashtra Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MAHA-METRO)Operated byNagpur MetroLine(s)Aqua LinePlatformsSide platformPlatform-1 → Prajapati NagarPlatform-2 → Lokmanya NagarTracks2ConstructionStructure typeElevated, Doubl…
1984 film by Dennis Shryack Not to be confused with Flash Point (film). FlashpointTheatrical release posterDirected byWilliam TannenWritten byDennis ShryackMichael ButlerBased onFlashpointby George LaFountaineStarring Kris Kristofferson Treat Williams Rip Torn Tess Harper CinematographyPeter MossEdited byDavid GarfieldMusic byTangerine DreamProductioncompaniesHBO PicturesSilver Screen PartnersDistributed byTri-Star PicturesRelease date August 31, 1984 (1984-08-31) Running time92 m…
2018 film by Mari Selvaraj Pariyerum PerumalPosterDirected byMari SelvarajWritten byMari SelvarajProduced byPa. RanjithStarringKathirAnandhiCinematographySridharEdited bySelva R. K.Music bySanthosh NarayananProductioncompanyNeelam ProductionsDistributed byLyca ProductionsRelease date 28 September 2018 (2018-09-28) Running time154 minutesCountryIndiaLanguageTamil Pariyerum Perumal (transl. The God who mounts a Horse) is a 2018 Indian Tamil-language drama film, directed by Mar…
Telephone area code in northeast Indiana, United States Area Code map for all of Indiana Area code 260 is a telephone area code in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the northeastern part of the U.S. state of Indiana. Cities served include Angola, Auburn, Bluffton, Butler, Columbia City, Decatur, Fort Wayne, Huntington, New Haven, and Wabash. History In 1947, American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T) published the first configuration of proposed numbering plan areas (NPAs) for a new …
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. (January 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary …
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.138.36.47