Talk:Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago/GA1
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The lead section is too short.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Most main issues are covered only superficially. The "History" section is far too short, and "Collection" consists almost entirely of a short list.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Lampman (talk) 13:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-05-15T13:07:00.000Z","author":"Lampman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lampman-2009-05-15T13:07:00.000Z-Museum_of_Contemporary_Art,_Chicago_GA_Reassessment","replies":[]}}-->
I have expanded the article about 25%. Let me know if more is needed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-05-16T04:07:00.000Z","author":"TonyTheTiger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyTheTiger-2009-05-16T04:07:00.000Z-Museum_of_Contemporary_Art,_Chicago_GA_Reassessment","replies":["c-Lampman-2009-05-18T12:24:00.000Z-TonyTheTiger-2009-05-16T04:07:00.000Z"]}}-->
- Thanks for your work, I believe the article is now good enough to be kept as a GA. Lampman (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-05-18T12:24:00.000Z","author":"Lampman","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lampman-2009-05-18T12:24:00.000Z-TonyTheTiger-2009-05-16T04:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
|
|