This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Equine Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Agriculture: Livestock Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Mammals Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mule article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months

“Aproximadamente en los años 30's” in the Wikimedia page, but that's a 1948 Chevy at the right side of the photo. I don't know how to comment on W’media pages or what would be appropriate here. Snigblitz (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2025 and 25 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Biol412edit (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Alexys Kwong, Hartman1217, Jfm1105, Annasnags2025.

— Assignment last updated by Annasnags2025 (talk) 02:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Per MOS:IMAGES, the images need to be relevant, illustrative, educational, of high quality, etc. The gallery contains far too many images where the mules are tiny unrecognizable blips in some vast landscape. We need better images. Here are some examples of images that could be used:

• a military pack mule
• a mule foal
• a pack mule on lead
• pair of mules pulling a wagon
• a mule plowing
• a draft horse mule
• a mule doing barrel racing
• a mule doing dressage

Every single one of these photos is a better illustration of mules than every single photo in the current gallery. These are contemporary photographs, in color, with a mule front and center and highly visible in each photograph. There are hundreds of wonderful photos in WikiCommons. Almost any of them would be better than the current selection.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 06:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I think the cover image should be changed to a different photo of a mule. The grey mule image is unusually horse-like to the point that it does not accurately represent the appearance of the majority of mule hybrids, and is an outlier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dottolabs (talk • contribs) 21:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree. The main photo should select a more typical-colored mule (brown with light points visible), and should be a broadside image showing typical mule conformation, if we can find one like that. Something closer to this one, though hopefully in color. Or this one of a mule, if only it was a full broadside view—though this would be a better choice for the primary image, over the current white mule behind a gate with his hindquarters in the dark.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 06:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I think the infertility has nothing to do with the parity. Even a imaginary chromosome composition of 32+32 would of no help since there are no homologous chromosomes at all. The genomes of the two parent animals are too different, so there's no such thing as a pair of chromosomes for mules. 129.104.244.86 (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Got a source for that? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ah sorry, perhaps I was wrong. I noticed the sentences

${\displaystyle \bullet }$ Male ligers are consequently sterile, while female ligers are not.

${\displaystyle \bullet }$ Like the liger, male tigons are sterile while the females are fertile.

So both parents having the same number of chromosomes (38 in this case) would indeed help: only one sex is sterile. 129.104.244.86 (talk) 08:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if you were right or wrong. Do you have a source for "no such thing as a pair of chromosomes for mules"? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply