Talk:Mighty Wurlitzer

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Untitled-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z-Untitled"],"text":"Untitled","linkableTitle":"Untitled"}-->

Untitled

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Untitled-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z-Untitled"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z-Untitled","timestamp":"2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Untitled-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z-Untitled"],"text":"Untitled","linkableTitle":"Untitled"}-->

Why does the second link on the disambiguation page, which says it links to "Mighty Wurlitzer" being used as a political term, link instead to an article on the political term "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy?" I believe this needs corrected but wanted to put it out there for input before I made a change. --Likeminded 02:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z","author":"Likeminded","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Likeminded-2005-12-24T02:59:00.000Z-Untitled","replies":[]}}-->

Yes, please DO correct that. See [1] etc. "Mighty Wurlitzer (CIA)" or perhaps "Mighty Wurlitzer (media)" etc. deserves its own article. The link to (Hillary Clinton's?) VRWC seems a POV attempt to ridicule and dismiss "Mighty Wurlitzer" history as a mere liberal whinge. 05:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

ok done ... now no lionger links to VRWC but to Mighty Wurlitzer (media) Wod observer 01:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)