Talk:List of cultural, intellectual, philosophical and technological revolutions

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Spinningspark-20221106154800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Proposed_deletion-20221106154800","replies":["c-Spinningspark-20221106154800-Proposed_deletion"],"text":"Proposed deletion","linkableTitle":"Proposed deletion"}-->

Proposed deletion

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Spinningspark-20221106154800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Proposed_deletion-20221106154800","replies":["c-Spinningspark-20221106154800-Proposed_deletion"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Spinningspark-20221106154800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Proposed_deletion-20221106154800","replies":["c-Spinningspark-20221106154800-Proposed_deletion"],"text":"Proposed deletion","linkableTitle":"Proposed deletion"}-->

I have removed the prod from this page. I'm having trouble seeing how this can be called cruft. First of all, it is a split from List of revolutions, so if this page is cruft, the parent page is even more so. Secondly, every item in the list is notable enough to have a standalone article and thus meets WP:CSC criterion #1 and are an aid to navigation. Thirdly, sources exist treating these categories as a group and therefore provide sources justifying the page under WP:GNG. For instance, Thomas S. Kuhn's highly influential book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions treats these revolutions as a group. This book treates agricultural revolutions as a group. It's not too difficult to find similar sources for the other title categories. SpinningSpark 15:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221106154800","author":"Spinningspark","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spinningspark-20221106154800-Proposed_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"Spinning"}}-->