This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: Libya This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Libya. Military history: African This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  African military history task force

See Talk:Libyan_National_Army#The_National_Libyan_Army_are_not_the_Libyan_Armed_Forces. Obviously sources are needed, and my guess is:

• Libyan armed forces or armed forces of Libya - overview article, includes LNA from 2011 to 2014 in detail
• Libyan Army or Libyan Army (2014–present) - Sarraj/West
• Libyan National Army or Libyan National Army (2014–present) - Haftar/East

as three separate articles would probably make sense, even though anti-WP:SPLIT-Wikipedians might object to having the three separate articles. The WP-notable militias and their relations to the "armies" would be useful information too - such as Libya Dawn (presently a redirect), Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries, Category:Jihadist groups in Libya. Otherwise people trying to follow what's happening have to believe whatever labels a particular newspaper article choose to use. (I'm not volunteering for this tidying...) Boud (talk) 01:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-04-23T01:42:00.000Z","author":"Boud","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Boud-2019-04-23T01:42:00.000Z-Sources_+_lots_of_editing_needed_for_disambiguation","replies":["c-Boud-2019-04-25T19:52:00.000Z-Boud-2019-04-23T01:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

The two articles together look a lot less confusing now - thanks! Obviously some work is still needed, but anyone with internet access who wishes to do so can help... Boud (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-04-25T19:52:00.000Z","author":"Boud","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Boud-2019-04-25T19:52:00.000Z-Boud-2019-04-23T01:42:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• PM md. 63.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230408080800","author":"Community Tech bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Community_Tech_bot-20230408080800-A_Commons_file_used_on_this_page_or_its_Wikidata_item_has_been_nominated_for_del","replies":[]}}-->