This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

I'm new at this so please forgive me if I'm not doing things correctly. I assure everyone that I have verified everything that I briefly discuss below.

The Wikipedia article on the "Kaye Effect" is almost completely false.

The fluid dynamics begin at the atomic level because what so-called "atoms" physically are is "Universal Extreme Fluid" (UEF) 'contained within' surrounding UEF because, during some creation violence, 'local c' was exceeded and more UEF was 'contained within' a spherical volume than could escape the surface area of that volume as the creation violence rapidly subsides and 'local c' returns to 'average local c'.

What the so-called "Kaye Effect" physically is is a macroscopic version of the same UEF 'containing' UEF that occurs at the atomic level.

Depending on the viscosity of the fluid, the poured stream builds up a mound on the surface of the receiving fluid because the fluid's 'local c' is decreased an amount that's correlated to the fluid's viscosity, and that 'local c' decrease is what physicallly underpins everything that is involved in the formation and 'sustenance' of every 'ejectile' stream that will be formed.

Because when the fluid cannot 'get out of its own way', the surface of the fluid 'hardens' to fluid-additions, which leaves the only direction in which the poured stream can move being away from the surface of the receiving fluid, with the previously instantiated surface fluid 'mound's 'instantaneous' geometry determining 'the' angle at which the ejectile stream will be directed.

Which is exactly the same thing that occurs in "emission" dynamics at the atomic level, for the same 'local c' variation reason.

Forgive me, please, but I have verified the above with respect to all known experimental results, can provide this verification to anyone and everyone, and have rewritten all of Physics accordingly.

So, although my colleagues in Physics will be 'skeptical', they can only be 'skeptical' with respect to that which stands verified to be True.

I would like very much to write a Wiki on the larger set of dynamics.

My email address is [email protected].

K. P. Collins, author of Tapered Harmony, which is a TOE verivied at all scales, infinitely-small to infinitely-large. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.228.7 (talk) 09:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply