This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ethnic groups Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Celts (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts Gaul Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

What kind of name is Medhelan? It's not Gaulish (or if it is, it's spelled very eccentrically). QuartierLatin1968 22:28, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

As a matter of fact, it does not exist. It is an hoax, invented by people who tried to make up a Gaulish word. A big discussion is taking place in the Italian wiki: look here. Unfortunately, hoaxes tend to spread in a very quick way. Let's hope to stop it before it spreads in many other wikis. --Vermondo 12:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Acerrae, described as the only fortified place of the Insubres, links to an article about Acerra in southern Italy. Is that the right one? It seems a long way from Insubria. Rojomoke (talk) 09:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well spotted! There are three places and should be three articles; the article ACERRAE in William Smith’s Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography covers them. Ian Spackman (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. Acerrae is now a disambiguation page offering the links to Acerrae (Campania), Acerrae (Cisalpine Gaul), and Acerrae Vatriae. Ian Spackman (talk) 10:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Acerrae is identified by all authors as modern-day Pizzighettone, on the banks of the Adda river (Kruta, Manfredi, Grassi, etc...)

This statement doesn't make a lot of sense to me:

"Though ethnically Celtic at the time of Roman conquest, they were most likely the result of the fusion of pre-existing Ligurian, Celtic and Italic population strata with Gaulish tribes who had come from what is now southern France."

The first part of the statement (that they were ethnically "Celtic") seems contradicted by the fusion statement, which is unsupported by a scholarly reference. Note the fudge of "most likely," which means there must be discussion of this somewhere. "Gaulish" is usually used of the language, I think; "Gallic" of the peoples. Better is "Celtic-speaking," if that's the case.

That the Romans regarded them as Gauls, or Celtic, can be stated as fact; we can define their Celticity as asserted in ancient sources. Testing their Celticity in modern terms is a separate task.

Also, "at the time of Roman conquest" — what does that mean? The first Roman commanders crossed the Po and fought the Insubres in 224, but the article implies that the Romans were instantaneously successful. That wasn't the case. In 199, for instance, Insubres defeated Gn. Baebius Tamphilus at Ariminum, after it had been a Latin colony for decades; and that's pretty far south of Mediolanum. The article seems to omit Gallic victories. This is to fall prey to the myth of the Roman military steamroller as a kind of manifest destiny, when in fact there are various points in the Italo-Gallic wars when things could've gone a different direction, and momentarily did. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply