This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism
This redirect is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I think a small change could be made to the following text: "..archived by Google News.." Technically, Google News indexes news sites such as Infoshop News. Archiving means something different, which Google News isn't doing. Chuck0 (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I changed it to "carried", which may be a more accessible term for readers. Newspapers carry wire reports, and the way Google republishes news sites appears comparable. Or is that wrong in this context? ·:· Will Beback·:·04:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Would it be possible for somebody to rewrite this article to remove the personal stuff about me? Infoshop is a collective project and this personal stuff is misleading. Otherwise I'm going to ask for removal of this page. Thanks. Chuck0 (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
The article gives no personal information about you. If there are diffs where someone posted personal info, have those revisions oversighted. We are not removing encyclopedic content as it relates to your involvement with infoshop.org. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
.svg){kind=icon}
