This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Discographies This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles

Please see WP:CHART#Certifications. "Certifications should be sourced directly to certifying agencies, most of which provide a searchable database. When such a database is not available, other reliable sources may be used..." RIAA has a searchable database, thus should wait for them to say that they did it. Acceptable PRIOR to appearing in THEIR database, would be if THEY have a news article stating DOUBLE PLATINUM or 2x Platinum. This would be similar to Billboard stating in a news article some new chart positions BEFORE they updated THEIR charts. At least they say it themselves. BELIEVE me, I am just following the Wikipedia policies, as you've seen in my other recent edits here. I have absolutely no "ill-will" towards Fifth Harmony or yourself. This was a similar situation while awaiting RIAA to update "Worth It" from Gold to Platinum. Once they did, I myself sourced and "spread the news" throughout the 5H articles here.—Iknow23 (talk) 02:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-15T02:47:00.000Z","author":"Iknow23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Iknow23-2015-08-15T02:47:00.000Z-Wait_for_the_certifying_agency_to_update_THEIR_database.","replies":[]}}-->
I do wish that RIAA would update their database immediately. It would save us from all this hassle.—Iknow23 (talk) 02:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-15T02:50:00.000Z","author":"Iknow23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Iknow23-2015-08-15T02:50:00.000Z-Wait_for_the_certifying_agency_to_update_THEIR_database.","replies":[]}}-->

"Worth It" is certified 2x Platinum in US. Certification date = Aug 26, 2015.HERE.—Iknow23 (talk) 02:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-27T02:01:00.000Z","author":"Iknow23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Iknow23-2015-08-27T02:01:00.000Z-Update_\"Worth_It\"_is_certified_2x_Platinum_in_US.","replies":[]}}-->

5Hcontributor has repeatedly removed "I'm In Love With a Monster" from the main singles section of the article, opting to place it in the promotional singles section, later demanding that I provide them with a source (I assume had they correctly finished their edit summary, would have asked me for a source to prove it was a fully blown single). 5Hcontributor, please provide a reliable source here that describes "I'm In Love With a Monster" to be a promotional single. The source already attached to the listing, the iTunes source, indeed proves it is a single, but says nothing about the single being promotional. Since you are the one who is so strongly campaigning to have this listing in the promotional singles section, it is your responsibility to provide extra sourcing. I think Chasewc91 (I'd appreciate your input here, Chase) summed it up best at Ariana Grande discography, in a similar situation. To remove the song from the main singles and stick it in promo singles, when no such source has confirmed the song to be as such, is original research. Azealia911 _talk 00:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-31T00:09:00.000Z","author":"Azealia911","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Azealia911-2015-08-31T00:09:00.000Z-Promo?","replies":["c-Chasewc91-2015-08-31T00:13:00.000Z-Azealia911-2015-08-31T00:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

"Promotional single" definitely needs sourcing. Chase (talk | contributions) 00:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-31T00:13:00.000Z","author":"Chasewc91","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Chasewc91-2015-08-31T00:13:00.000Z-Azealia911-2015-08-31T00:09:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Chase"}}-->

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fifth Harmony discography's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "BPI":

• From List of music recording certifications: "The BPI". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
• From British Phonographic Industry: Gallup (4 February 1989). "The Top of the Pops Chart" (PDF). Record Mirror: 4. Retrieved 16 July 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:48, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-04-02T00:48:00.000Z","author":"AnomieBOT","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AnomieBOT-2016-04-02T00:48:00.000Z-Orphaned_references_in_Fifth_Harmony_discography","replies":[]}}-->

Would her equally credited duet with Shawn Mendes titled "I Know What You Did Last Summer" be noteworthy enough for a spot on the groups' discography page? I mean after all, the song is her only solo work and since she's still currently a member of Fifth Harmony, she isn't eligible for her own discography page. Ikwthlb (talk) 03:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Ikwthlb[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-09T03:33:00.000Z","author":"Ikwthlb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ikwthlb-2016-07-09T03:33:00.000Z-Camila_Cabello_on_Shawn_Mendes'_\"I_Know_What_You_Did_Last_Summer\".","replies":[]}}-->

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fifth Harmony discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6EEYfYVwc to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-20T18:34:00.000Z","author":"InternetArchiveBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-InternetArchiveBot-2016-07-20T18:34:00.000Z-External_links_modified","replies":[]}}-->

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fifth Harmony discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130521232120/http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/index.html to http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311114957/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesSingleAccreds2016.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesSingleAccreds2016.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://national-report.com/nacionalColombia.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-31T11:02:00.000Z","author":"InternetArchiveBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-InternetArchiveBot-2016-12-31T11:02:00.000Z-External_links_modified_2","replies":[]}}-->

"Angel" is a promotional single so it needs to be on there. DatBoy101 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-10T23:45:00.000Z","author":"DatBoy101","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DatBoy101-2017-08-10T23:45:00.000Z-Angel","replies":[]}}-->

Actually it is a single, Sorry about that DatBoy101 (talk) 23:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-10T23:47:00.000Z","author":"DatBoy101","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DatBoy101-2017-08-10T23:47:00.000Z-Angel","replies":[]}}-->

And now it's a promotional single DatBoy101 (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-11T18:25:00.000Z","author":"DatBoy101","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DatBoy101-2017-08-11T18:25:00.000Z-Angel","replies":[]}}-->

Fifth Harmony's 7/27 has sold 200k to date in the U.S. According to:

• [1]
• [2]

Meddymarl (talk) 01:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-10-07T01:36:00.000Z","author":"Meddymarl","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Meddymarl-2017-10-07T01:36:00.000Z-Up_to_date_7\/27_sales","replies":[]}}-->

I know nothing about this artist, but it looks like someone has engaged in a persistent vandalism campaign against this article. I suspect the person(s) doing this were vandalizing the Christina Perri discography until that page was protected around May 12th. I am rather fascinated to discover that people engage in this sort of vandalism. I am also dismayed to discover that Wikipedia seems unable to stop it. Perhaps this page will receive temporary protection. However, at that point I expect the vandal with simply move on to a similar page.

Mark W. Miller (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-05-30T14:28:00.000Z","author":"Mark W. Miller","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mark_W._Miller-2018-05-30T14:28:00.000Z-Vandalism","replies":[]}}-->

According to Soundscan and SPS (I have an account with them):

• Reflection-1,250,000
• 7/27- 1,055,000
• Fifth Harmony- 170,000

(As of 2018) Source:^[1] 173.62.188.239 (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-01T01:24:00.000Z","author":"173.62.188.239","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-173.62.188.239-2019-02-01T01:24:00.000Z-Album_Sales","replies":[]}}-->