Talk:Fa (philosophy)

Article

Article linked below is a good article but it was used here as reference for a historically nonsensical account of Xunzi as the originator of Fa in Legalism. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/xunzi/FourLights (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Xunzi was the teacher of Han Fei, but not the originator of Fa in Chinese Realpolitik/Legalism. The much earlier Shen Dao also uses Fa.FourLights (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2015 (UTC

Xunzi is only the teacher Han Fei mythologicaly, there’s no real evidence of it to my knowledge. I’ll try and remember to import more material here from the Chinese Legalism page, which includes Shen Dao. Feel free to remind me if I don’t know do, I have other pages I need to work on also.FourLights (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) IffyChat -- 17:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply



– Most Category:Philosophical concepts use "(philosophy)" and another Chinese philosophy term Jing (philosophy) already does, so this is about maintaining better WP:CONSISTENT titles. On a basic level "(concept)" is far too broad a term to use as a disambiguator. -- Netoholic @ 20:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 04:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is a question of categorization. I don't know who you'd talk to about this. I can't even get anyone to really review my pages most of the time, unless it's just an off person with a criticism.FourLights (talk)



The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.