Talk:Essentially contested concept
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lindsay658, master of disguise
Inserted new "Concepts/notions vs. conceptions/instantiations" from 129.94.6.28 (I forgot to log in) Lindsay658 07:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Made last edit from 129.94.6.30, forgetting to log in (again!!!). Sorry to confuse things Lindsay658 08:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Reversion
I have reverted the previous change made by 66.30.181.33 because, regardless of what he/she may think of what was said, the text is a direct quotation -- and, therefore, must remain in its correct form.Lindsay658 07:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Can somebody write references in normal way? This is difficult to understand. --147.251.103.20 (talk) 09:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Great 👍🏻 116.204.242.30 (talk) 10:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Legibility
As currently written, this article's prose is unusually difficult to parse. See WP:MODERNLANG. Lunaroxas (talk) 00:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- This is a minimally useful report as written. Could you point to specific examples of the issue? Remsense ‥ 论 00:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- I simplified the lead since it was too abstract and incomprehensible. I added some sources to help clarify what this means. Ramos1990 (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- This is a massive improvement. Thank you.
- Apologies, @Remsense, for not responding earlier. My principal issue was not only with the introduction, but the Features subsection. The article, as previously written, nested speaking footnotes as citations, omitting a crucial sentence that introduced the elaborations upon Gallie's original definition. I've gone ahead and cleaned up the language to clearly indicate the sentence is announcing the beginning of a list of elements. Lunaroxas (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- I simplified the lead since it was too abstract and incomprehensible. I added some sources to help clarify what this means. Ramos1990 (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.