This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group. University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page really needs to be re-written with better english —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.113.149 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

No mention of Vaizey's new ministerial positions as "joint business and culture minister" he has also been appointed to oversee the roll out of super-fast broadband: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10131375.stm Angryafghan (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I was looking at Ed Vaizey's majority on the infobox and I don't think it's from the 2015 General Election; should the "Majority" box show an MP's current majority, or the majority they were originally elected with? gbrading (ταlκ) 15:32, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ed Vaizey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121103110641/http://www.cfofp.co.uk:80/whoweare.php to http://www.cfofp.co.uk/whoweare.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ed Vaizey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101205134/http://www.oxfordshireconservatives.com/wcca/ to http://www.oxfordshireconservatives.com/wcca/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110904101205/http://www.artforums.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8648 to http://www.artforums.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8648

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ed Vaizey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110409233344/http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/default.asp?pageRef=188 to http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/default.asp?pageRef=188

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

While the section on Parliamentary expenses scandal of 2009 is surely as relevant as it is to any of the many MPs about whom we list loads of trivia like this, I think the 8p one is just silly to include. I literally have no idea why it happened other than to say I assume that staff were asked to keep a log of all their driving and then add it up and submit it as a claim. But the most important thing is that a claim for £0.08 (or £0.16 in the other example we mention) is not a matter of encyclopedic interest - there was not even a tiny suggestion of wrongdoing.

(Quite separately, I would argue that many of them need to be cleaned up as in most cases where there were no criminal charges or parliamentary reprimands it strikes me as too trivial for a persons biography).

I am not making any edits myself since I know Lord Vaisey quite well dating back to when he was the DCMS Minister here in the UK.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removed as trivia. It really is a non-story and he wasn’t even driving. KJP1 (talk) 10:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply