Talk:Economic system

Mutualism links to wrong article

The mutualism link featured in most sidebars here goes to the article about Mutualism as an insurance movement, not Mutualism as a form of economic theory. Bismvth (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Einsteins relevance in the socialism description

Why is Einstein brought up here at all? He's not the most relevant or commonly referenced proponent and the paragraph and quote is disconnected from the rest of the article. In the context of the very short and neutral captialism and mixed market descriptions this article is very skewed. And referencing the position of a famous figures positive argument for an ideology doesnt give equal representation. I don't think I'd mind this if there were a "laymans argument" for each ideology category. That'd be interesting but I don't think that kind of sourcing is very typical of Wikipedia. 83.233.197.54 (talk) 07:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I agree with you; I removed the quote. This would be like asking J-Lo's opinion on the theory of relativity. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 02:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Expropriation links to the wrong article

Both nationalization and expropriation in the economic sidebar/category leads to the nationalization page, when the latter should go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain Jotungard (talk) 11:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Theoretical AI-driven economic models

Emerging conceptual models posit future economic systems driven by synthetic cognition, where artificial agents autonomously generate value, bypassing traditional human labour frameworks. Founder8 (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.