Talk:EMC effect

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Update_needed-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z-Update_needed"],"text":"Update needed","linkableTitle":"Update needed"}-->

Update needed

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Update_needed-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z-Update_needed"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Update_needed-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z-Update_needed"],"text":"Update needed","linkableTitle":"Update needed"}-->

The results of the EMC collaboration (ration >1 in the low x region, < 1 in the high x region) are no longer latest state of the art. In the past 30 years many more experiments have been done with considerably higher precision. The ration per x has turned out to be a wavy curve rather than a linar relation: at low x ( <0.1) it is less than 1, in intermediate x (approx 0.2) there is a slight overshooting and then it gets negative again. At very high x (close to 1) it gets positive again. See e.g. Fig.2 in http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/53091 Reilinger (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z","author":"Reilinger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Reilinger-2013-09-03T14:16:00.000Z-Update_needed","replies":[]}}-->