This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

The weak duality theorem states that the optimum of the dual LP at any feasible solution is always a bound on the optimum of the primal LP at any feasible solution

What is optimum of ANY solution? Optimum exists for problem, for function, but for solution... Strange thing. Do you mean '... the value of the dual LP at any feasible solution is always a bound on the value of the primal LP at any feasible solution? Jumpow (talk) 16:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Another strange statement

${\displaystyle y_{L}+F_{2}\cdot y_{F}+P_{2}\cdot y_{P}\geq S_{2}}$

(the farmer must receive no less than S₂ for his barley)

On the right = cost of product

On the left side - spends (cost of used resource * amount of resource).

So unequality says: spends > cost

But what means statement must receive no less than, if it is spends?

Jumpow (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If we are going to use the word application, the heading should specify what it is an application to.

Theoretical application in complexity theory — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:4DE8:372D:3152:B1BD (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The section states that the weak duality theorem implies that finding a single feasible solution is as hard as finding an optimal feasible solution. However, it seems to me that the argument "If the combined LP has no feasible solution, then the primal LP has no feasible solution either." requires the strong duality theorem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hkoehlernz (talk • contribs) 01:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Near the end of the article the term "standard form" is introduced. The articel should explain what "standard form" is or at least add a link to its definition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.147.36.113 (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply