Talk:Devil's Guard

Fact or fiction?

Probably the latter. Prof. Douglas Porch in his seminal work on the Legion dismissed it as fiction. I have emailed back-and-forth quite a bit with Bill Brooks, who was in the Legion in the 70s, who has not a shred of doubt that it was fiction. Too bad. It was a great read.GorillaTheater (talk) 22:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


I would not be too quick to dismiss the entire book as totally fictional69.152.64.204 (talk) 07:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I enjoyed the book. As to its authenticity, well who cares? After all, Bravo Two Zero has had its critics too. CrowbusterUK (talk) 22:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


"Battalion of the Damned" actually was the name for BILOM, a French military unit made up of Frenchmen who had been imprisoned by French authorities for service in the German military. These men were given the option to serve in this unit in order to "make amends to the nation". They fought in Indochina but were never a part of the Foreign Legion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.105.99.178 (talk) 23:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's considered BS by many old Legionaries and actually a form of Communist Black propaganda which wanted to portray the fight against the Viet Minh, and by inference the Viet Cong, as 'Nazi' and 'Fascist' and thus morally bankrupt. I was published in 1971 after all. Those ex-Nazis who certainly did serve in the Legion in the 40's and 50's tended to keep their politics quiet and wouldn't have been boastful like the characters in this book. The Legion possessed people too who had suffered under the Nazis Irisismykid (talk) 22:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The author is also known as Eric Meyer and there are more books in the series

These include WWII prequels, a book set in Afghanistan, etc. https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/4996978.Eric_Meyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.65.83 (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.