PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Talk:Concept processing

I would suggest the addition of Outlines as another technology that is used. Outlines differ from templates in that an outline is designed and customized before the point of care visit, but it is soft coded allowing changes to be made over time. Another difference is that in an outline instead of having text entry boxes like in a template the user selectes concepts from predefined soft coded lists. These lists represent a click-per-concept interface that is both fluid and powerful and does not involve the use of an atificial inteligence in the gathering of information. Outlines are used in several EMR's including ChartWare which is a product I have some personal experience with in the past.

The entire page is *bogus*.

1. "concept processing" is not a standard term in AI. If it was, you'd see lots of other pages linking here. For something that could more conventionally be called "concept processing" see the "processing" node of the workflow of e-discovery: http://edrm.net/

2. The whole thing is almost verbatim copied from a single EHR vendor's marketing materials, c.f. http://www.infor-med.com/concept-processing.htm. NPOV this ain't.

3. The notion of finding a precedential case that's most similar to a new case and offering to customize the precedential solution for the new case is properly called Case-based reasoning.

Suggestion: add one sentence on use of case-based reasoning in medicine to the case-based reasoning article. Either drop the "concept processing" article altogether, or replace it by an article on user interfaces for collection of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data in medicine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.182.180.167 (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Remove speedy

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the speedy, my google quickly found a couple of sources Concept Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition and Concept Processing which would make WP:A11 in appropriate. Also this is 2006 article with multiple contributors. The arguments to delete as A11 may be valid, but it to complex for a speedy. It should go to WP:AfD to reach a consensus. Jeepday (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.