PROFILPELAJAR.COM

This is an archive of past discussions about Clarinet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Acoustics_section-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z-Acoustics_section"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Acoustics section","linkableTitle":"Acoustics section"}-->

Acoustics section

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Acoustics_section-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z-Acoustics_section"],"uneditableSection":true}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z-Acoustics_section","timestamp":"2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Acoustics_section-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z-Acoustics_section"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Acoustics section","linkableTitle":"Acoustics section"}-->

As a physicist and professional clarinetist, I can say that much of the Acoustics section is nonsense. Furthermore, it has no sources for many of the nonsense statements made (because there are no sources that back up physical nonsense). The foremost authority on the acoustics of the clarinet was the famous physicist Arthur Benade. He wrote the book called the Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics which is sort of the bible of musical acoustics. All the information needed for this section is in that book with copious actual citations in there. He was also a clarinetist so he had a special affinity for that part of his vast research and writing. I have copies of all of his unpublished work on the clarinet as well, and I would be happy to attempt to rewrite and properly source the non-physical nonsense that is currently there. I can't imagine how this article achieved a rating as a "Good Article" with such nonsense, though, so I suspect the minute I attempt to put some actual physics in there I will be descended upon by non-physicists. How can such poorly sourced (and barely sourced at all for that matter) section be considered a "Good Article"? --TheClarinetGuy _talk 04:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z","author":"Cohler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cohler-2017-01-20T04:52:00.000Z-Acoustics_section","replies":[],"displayName":"TheClarinetGuy talk"}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-External_links_modified-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z-External_links_modified"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"External links modified","linkableTitle":"External links modified"}-->

External links modified

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-External_links_modified-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z-External_links_modified"],"uneditableSection":true}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z-External_links_modified","timestamp":"2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-External_links_modified-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z-External_links_modified"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"External links modified","linkableTitle":"External links modified"}-->

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarinet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130228195253/http://www.europeanclarinetassociation.org/uploads/media/Bass_Clarinet_in_A_-_Keith_Bowen.pdf to http://www.europeanclarinetassociation.org/uploads/media/Bass_Clarinet_in_A_-_Keith_Bowen.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z","author":"InternetArchiveBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-InternetArchiveBot-2017-12-21T12:29:00.000Z-External_links_modified","replies":[]}}-->