This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. Since Citizens' Party is apparently unambiguous, I've moved it there. —Nightstallion(?)10:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-01-25T10:45:00.000Z","author":"Nightstallion","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nightstallion-2006-01-25T10:45:00.000Z-Untitled","replies":[]}}-->
I've created a redirect from Citizens' Party, since that is the correct version. The name is in the plural, and so the Citizens part of it should end in an apostrophy with no apostrophy between the n and the s. Small as the party was, it did contain more than one member. Someone with the power to do so, should rectify this. Cheerio Io19:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-01-20T19:30:00.000Z","author":"Io","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Io-2006-01-20T19:30:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":[]}}-->
Discussion
Add any additional comments
Comment Since this is a grammatical error, I certainly don't think this would be a controversial move and so no voting section is being created. If you object, please discuss first! In the likely event that this page move goes ahead, the article should also be corrected (replace any "Citizen's" with "Citizens'"!) --Lox (t,c) 21:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-01-20T21:31:00.000Z","author":"Lox","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lox-2006-01-20T21:31:00.000Z-Discussion","replies":[]}}-->
Agree that it seems non-controversial. Jonathunder11:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-01-24T11:32:00.000Z","author":"Jonathunder","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jonathunder-2006-01-24T11:32:00.000Z-Discussion","replies":[]}}-->
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.