Talk:COLAGE

Untitled comments

Agree that articles should be merged-.Wuzzy 22:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Totally agreed. How do we merge them? katerw 25, February 2006

I merged the articles into one, and marked the other one for deletion. I trust this is okay. Wuzzy 18:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Discusion carried over from merged article

Category

People who are raised by LGBT people are de facto members of the LGBT community. COLAGE claims to be an LGBT organization, and it is accepted without question by the LGBT community. Dave 06:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree.Wuzzy 10:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

You what? Can you source that? For reasons that should be obvious, Dave, I have to discount what it claims for itself. Clearly, the group is not activist for LGBT issues, nor are its members LGBT. I'd like to see a source before you place this organisation in the category. Grace Note 10:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sources for classifying as LGBT and LGBT rights organization
Don't care what it says about itself.
with other organisations.
a guide to resources in the area, not LGBT orgs.
Can be added by anyone. Not a reputable source.


Hardly shows recognition by the LGBT community though.


Support is not what's disputed.
Can you provide sources that COLAGE isnot an LGBt organization? Wuzzy 14:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
ACLU
Gay and Lesbian Medical Association
QueerList
Also, per Wuzzy above. Dave 19:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
I can refer to most definitions of LGBT. I'll accept your sources despite the frank nonsense of describing it so. The GLMA one was particularly ridiculous when you look at what else is on it. It's a list of organisations that might be expected to include LGBTs but are not exclusive. You can add yourself to Queer List just by asking

Here's a listyou're not on:

[1] You can add a link though, so go for it. That's the good thing about directories. You can call yourself anything so long as the guy at the other end doesn't check too closely.

I wouldn't have had a thing to say, btw, if you had written "LGBT-related organisation", which is clearly NPOV and factually correct.Grace Note 02:03, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.