This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Bedfordshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. The infobox box status of this article has been marked as: Incomplete

Sources:

• NY Times
• International Herald Tribune
• Time
• Guardian
• BBC

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-26178868 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.40.207 (talk) 07:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blue Arrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213140359/http://www.impellam.com/impellam.asp?SiteID=93&PageID=2925&SectionID=308 to http://www.impellam.com/impellam.asp?SiteID=93&PageID=2925&SectionID=308
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713021526/http://www.impellam.com/impellam.asp?shownews=238&SiteID=93&PageID=2918&SectionID=0 to http://www.impellam.com/impellam.asp?shownews=238&SiteID=93&PageID=2918&SectionID=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi all,

I noticed that an edit made on 30 April 2025 to the Blue Arrow article was reverted. The changes included updated company history, Trade Memberships, Procurement Framework Awards, Industry Awards, Charitable Fundraising and added citations.

I believe these edits added valuable and accurate information. If there were concerns about sourcing or neutrality, I’d be happy to help find reliable references or rephrase the content to meet Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Here’s a link to the version from that date for reference: Blue Arrow - Wikipedia.

Thanks for your time and contributions! BeautifulBill (talk) 21:14, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

The whole thing reads like press release advertising the organization. In addition it was added by an undeclared Paid editor. My question for you is what is your relationship to the topic of the Article, please review COI, paid, and Socking--VViking_TalkEdits 21:19, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I’d like to suggest incorporating content from this revision https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blue_Arrow&oldid=1288165404 into the current article, as it provides a more accurate and complete overview of Blue Arrow’s history and operational sectors. These updates would improve the article’s accuracy and relevance. BeautifulBill (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi all, I’d like to disclose that I work for Blue Arrow, which is the subject of this article. I understand Wikipedia’s guidelines on Conflict of Interest, paid editing, and neutrality, and I’m committed to following them. I’m here to suggest improvements to the article that are factual, well-sourced, and written in a neutral tone. I will not make direct edits to the article itself, but I’ll use this Talk page to propose changes for review by independent editors. Please let me know if there’s a preferred format or process for submitting suggestions. I welcome feedback and collaboration to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you! BeautifulBill (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Blue Arrow Logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply